MHB Prove $\prod\limits_{i=1}^{n}\frac{\sin a_i}{a_i}\le(\frac{\sin a}{a})^n$

  • Thread starter Thread starter anemone
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality involving the product of sine functions and their arguments, specifically that the product of the ratios of sine to the argument for a set of angles is less than or equal to the same ratio evaluated at the average of those angles. The angles are constrained to be between 0 and π. The proof hinges on properties of the sine function and inequalities related to convexity. Participants express appreciation for contributions and insights shared during the discussion. The overall goal is to establish a mathematical inequality that holds under the given conditions.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Let $0<a_i<\pi$, $i=1,\,\cdots,\,n$ and let $a=\dfrac{a_1+\cdots+a_n}{n}$. Prove that $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{n} \left(\dfrac{\sin a_i}{a_i}\right)\le \left(\dfrac{\sin a}{a}\right)^n$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Let $0<a_i<\pi$, $i=1,\,\cdots,\,n$ and let $a=\dfrac{a_1+\cdots+a_n}{n}$. Prove that $\displaystyle \prod_{i=1}^{n} \left(\dfrac{\sin a_i}{a_i}\right)\le \left(\dfrac{\sin a}{a}\right)^n$.

Since the natural log function is concave on $(0, \infty)$ and the sine function is positive and concave on $(0, \pi)$, the composition $x \mapsto \ln \sin x$ is concave on $(0, \infty)$. Therefore

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^n \ln \sin a_i \le \ln \sin a$.

Subtracting $a$ from both sides and using the formula $a = \frac{a_1 + \cdots + a_n}{n}$ results in

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n (\ln \sin a_i - a_i) \le \ln \sin a - a$,

or

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \ln \frac{\sin a_i}{a_i} \le \ln \frac{\sin a}{a}$.

Multiplying by $n$ and exponentiating yields

$\displaystyle \prod_{i = 1}^n \frac{\sin a_i}{a_i} \le \left(\frac{\sin a}{a}\right)^n$.
 
Euge said:
Since the natural log function is concave on $(0, \infty)$ and the sine function is positive and concave on $(0, \pi)$, the composition $x \mapsto \ln \sin x$ is concave on $(0, \infty)$. Therefore

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n}\sum_{i = 1}^n \ln \sin a_i \le \ln \sin a$.

Subtracting $a$ from both sides and using the formula $a = \frac{a_1 + \cdots + a_n}{n}$ results in

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n (\ln \sin a_i - a_i) \le \ln \sin a - a$,

or

$\displaystyle \frac{1}{n} \sum_{i = 1}^n \ln \frac{\sin a_i}{a_i} \le \ln \frac{\sin a}{a}$.

Multiplying by $n$ and exponentiating yields

$\displaystyle \prod_{i = 1}^n \frac{\sin a_i}{a_i} \le \left(\frac{\sin a}{a}\right)^n$.

Well done, Euge! And thanks for participating!:)
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top