Prove: Quotient Map If p:X->Y & Z Locally Compact Hausdorff Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter ak416
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Topology
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

If p: X -> Y is a quotient map and Z is a locally compact Hausdorff space, then the map m: p x i: X x Z -> Y x Z is indeed a quotient map. The discussion emphasizes the importance of the tube lemma and saturated neighborhoods in proving this assertion. A common misconception addressed is the assumption that p x i (U x V) = p(U) x i(V) directly leads to the conclusion that (p x i)^-1 (U x V) = p^-1(U) x i^-1(V) without further justification. The continuity of p x i must be established to confirm it as a quotient map.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quotient maps in topology
  • Familiarity with locally compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Knowledge of the tube lemma
  • Concept of saturated neighborhoods
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of quotient maps in topology
  • Explore the tube lemma and its applications in topology
  • Investigate the characteristics of locally compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Learn about saturated neighborhoods and their significance in topological proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in topology, graduate students studying advanced topology concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the properties of quotient maps and their applications in locally compact Hausdorff spaces.

ak416
Messages
121
Reaction score
0
Prove: If p:X->Y is a quotient map and if Z is a locally compact Hausdorff space, then the map m: p x i : X x Z -> Y x Z is a quotient map.

Note: i is the identity map on Z i assume. There is a few lines of hints talking about using the tube lemma and saturated neighborhoods which i don't feel like writing at the moment (see Munkres p.186). The main problem i have have with this is why not say: p x i (U x V) = p(U) x i(V), so (p x i)^-1 (U x V) = p^-1(U) x i^-1(V) (is this not true?). Because if it is true then the result seems trivial since p is a quotient map and the identity does nothing to change the openness of V. What am i missing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does it mean for p x i to be a quotient map? You can use what you've done to prove that p x i is continuous, but you would need to do more to prove that it's a quotient map.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
934
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K