Prove relation for squeezed state - Quantum Information

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the relation for the squeezed state operator S(ζ) and the annihilation operator a. The user attempts to derive the expression using a commutation relation and the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula but encounters difficulties simplifying the resulting commutator. Suggestions include substituting a†a using the commutation relation [a, a†] = 1 and recognizing the need for the Taylor expansion of hyperbolic functions to facilitate the proof. The conversation emphasizes the importance of careful computation of all terms in the commutator expansion to achieve the desired result.
Pentaquark5
Messages
17
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Prove the following relation for ##\zeta:=r e^{i \theta}##:
<br /> S(\zeta)^\dagger a S(\zeta)= a \cosh r - a^\dagger e^{i \theta} \sinh r<br />

with ##S(\zeta)=e^{1/2[\zeta^\ast a^2-\zeta(a^\dagger)^2]}## and ##a## being the annihilation operator with eigenvalue ##\alpha##.

Homework Equations


See above

The Attempt at a Solution


I used the following identity: ##e^{At}Be^{-At}=B+\frac{t}{1!}[A,B+\frac{t^2}{2!}\big[A,[A,B]\big]+\mathcal{O}## to write

<br /> \begin{align*}<br /> S(\zeta)^\dagger a S(\zeta)&amp;=\underbrace{\left(e^{1/2[\zeta^\ast a^2-\zeta(a^\dagger)^2]}\right)^\dagger}_{e^A} a \underbrace{\left(e^{1/2[\zeta^\ast a^2-\zeta(a^\dagger)^2]}\right)}_{e^{-A}} \\<br /> &amp;= e^A \; a \; e^{-A}\\<br /> &amp;=a+[A,a]+\frac{1}{2} \big[A,[A,a]\big]<br /> \end{align*}<br />

Computing the commutator ##[A,a]## yields:
<br /> [A,a]=\frac{1}{1}re^{i\theta}[a^\dagger a^\dagger a-a a^\dagger a^\dagger]<br />

I am not sure what to do with this expression, though. Is there any way to simplify it?

If not, what other way is there to prove the identity?

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Pentaquark5 said:
I am not sure what to do with this expression, though. Is there any way to simplify it?
Consider substituting ##a^\dagger a## with the help of the commutation ##[a,a^\dagger]=1##. Unfortunately, the above commutator expansion will have no constant or vanishing term so that you have to compute "all" terms (if you are clever enough, you should be ablo to find the pattern, though),
You will also need to know the Taylor expansion of hyperbolic functions.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K