Momentum Operator for the real scalar field

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the calculation of the momentum operator for a real scalar field, specifically addressing the expression for the momentum operator \(\vec{P}\) derived from the conjugate momentum \(\pi\) and the field \(\phi\). Participants analyze the integral expressions involving creation and annihilation operators \(a_p\) and \(a_p^\dagger\), and the use of delta functions to simplify the calculations. Key insights include the evaluation of integrals that vanish due to symmetry properties and the clarification of definitions of the conjugate momentum, referencing Peskin's "An Introduction to QFT" for standard definitions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) concepts
  • Familiarity with momentum operators and conjugate momenta
  • Knowledge of creation and annihilation operators in QFT
  • Proficiency in evaluating integrals involving delta functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the momentum operator in quantum field theory using Peskin's "An Introduction to QFT"
  • Learn about the properties of delta functions and their applications in quantum mechanics
  • Explore the implications of symmetry in integrals in quantum field calculations
  • Investigate renormalization techniques in quantum field theory
USEFUL FOR

Quantum field theorists, physicists studying particle physics, and advanced students seeking to deepen their understanding of momentum operators and their applications in quantum mechanics.

Markus Kahn
Messages
110
Reaction score
14
Homework Statement
Show that the momentum for the real scalar field reduces to
$$\vec{P} = \int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \vec{p} a_p^\dagger a_p.$$
Relevant Equations
$$\vec{P}=-\int dx^3 \pi \nabla \phi$$
$$\phi(\vec x )= \int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} (a_pe^{ipx} + a^\dagger_p e^{-ipx})$$
$$\pi(\vec x )= \int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 }\frac{i}{2} (a_p^\dagger e^{-ipx} - a_p e^{ipx})$$
I think the solution to this problem is a straightforward calculation and I think I was able to make reasonable progress, but I'm not sure how to finish this...

$$\begin{align*} \vec{P}&=-\int dx^3 \pi \nabla \phi\\
&= -\int\int\int dx^3\frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{du^3}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{i}{2} \left(a_u^\dagger e^{-iux} - a_u e^{iux}\right)\nabla \left(a_pe^{ipx} + a^\dagger_p e^{-ipx}\right)\\
&= -\int\int\int dx^3\frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{du^3}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{i}{2} (ip)\left(a_u^\dagger e^{-iux} - a_u e^{iux}\right)\left(a_pe^{ipx} - a^\dagger_p e^{-ipx}\right)\\
&= \int\int\int dx^3\frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{du^3}{(2\pi)^3} \frac{p}{2} \left(a_u^\dagger e^{-iux} - a_u e^{iux}\right)\left(a_pe^{ipx} - a^\dagger_p e^{-ipx}\right)\\
&= \int\int\frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{du^3}{(2\pi)^3}\times \\& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\frac{p}{2} \int dx^3 \left(a_u^\dagger a_p e^{i(p-u)x} +a_ua_p^\dagger e^{i(u-p)x} -a_u^\dagger a_p^\dagger e^{-i(u+p)x} - a_ua_p e^{i(p+u)x}\right)
\end{align*}$$

I know applied to every term of the sum the following formula:
$$\delta (x-\alpha )={\frac {1}{2\pi }}\int _{-\infty }^{\infty }e^{ip(x-\alpha )}\ dp,$$
which resulted in

$$\begin{align*}\vec{P}&= \int\int\frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{du^3}{(2\pi)^3}\times \\& \,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\frac{p}{2}(2\pi)^3 \left(a_u^\dagger a_p \delta(p-u) +a_ua_p^\dagger \delta(u-p) -a_u^\dagger a_p^\dagger \delta(u+p) - a_ua_p \delta(p+u)\right)\\
&= \int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{p}{2}\times\\ &\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \int du^3 \left(a_u^\dagger a_p \delta(u-p) +a_ua_p^\dagger \delta(u-p) -a_u^\dagger a_p^\dagger \delta(u+p) - a_ua_p \delta(u+p)\right)
\end{align*}$$
I'm not too sure about this step, but I basically used
$$\int f(x)\,\delta(x-a)\,dx =\int f(x)\,\delta(a-x)\,dx.$$
If I continue from here on I arrive at
$$\begin{align*}\vec P &= \int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{p}{2}\times\\ &\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\, \int du^3 \left((a_u^\dagger a_p+a_ua_p^\dagger )\delta(u-p) -(a_u^\dagger a_p^\dagger + a_ua_p) \delta(u+p)\right)\\
&=\int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{p}{2}\times (a_p^\dagger a_p+a_pa_p^\dagger )-(a_{-p}^\dagger a_p^\dagger + a_{-p}a_p)\\
&=\int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} \frac{p}{2}\times (2a_p^\dagger a_p+1 )-(a_{-p}^\dagger a_p^\dagger + a_{-p}a_p)\\
&=\int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3 2e(p)} p (a_p^\dagger a_p+\frac{1}{2} ) -(a_{-p}^\dagger a_p^\dagger + a_{-p}a_p)
\end{align*}$$
The term corresponding to the ##1/2## in parenthesis can be resolved with renormalization (as far as I understand), so we don't really need to bother with it. But what about the ##(a_{-p}^\dagger a_p^\dagger + a_{-p}a_p)##? How do I get rid of that?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi.
Say E(p)=E(-p), the integrand of
-\frac{1}{4}\int \frac{dp^3}{(2\pi)^3E(p)}p(a^\dagger_{-p} a^\dagger_p+a_{-p}a_p)
is antisymmetric for inverse of p . So the integral vanishes.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Markus Kahn
Hello Markus Kanh!
So, I examined your calculation and I have feeling that something is odd in your definition of conjugate momentum of the field. In the books that I have learning I never see yet that definition. I often see the following definition $$\pi(\vec x)=-i\int \frac {d^{3}p} {(2\pi)^{3} } {\sqrt{E_{p}/ 2}}(a_{p}e^{ipx}-a_{p}e^{-ipx})$$ One example is in the Peskin's book ''An introduction to QFT''. Anyway... this is just one comment.
About your question, we can show that the second term in your last equation is zero##\int \frac p {(2\pi)^{3}2E_p} (a_{-p}^\dagger a_{p}^\dagger+a_{-p}a_{p})\,d^{3}p=^{!}0##.
Consider the following integral $$I=\int \frac p {(2\pi)^{3}2E_p} a_{-p}^\dagger a_{p}^\dagger\,d^{3}p$$ we can change the variable ##p\to-p## That change don't change the value of integral because that integral is evaluated in all p-space. $$I=-\int \frac p {(2\pi)^{3}2E_p} a_{p}^\dagger a_{-p}^\dagger\,d^{3}p$$ summing these two pieces above, we have $$2I=\int \frac p {(2\pi)^{3}2E_p} (a_{-p}^\dagger a_{p}^\dagger-a_{p}^\dagger a_{-p}^\dagger)\,d^{3}p$$ that is $$2I=\int \frac p {(2\pi)^{3}2E_p}[a_{-p}^\dagger,a_{p}^\dagger]\,d^{3}p$$ note that ##[a_{-p}^\dagger,a_{p}^\dagger]=0## in this way we can saying that $$I=0$$ Similarly, we can show that the second term in the your last equation is also zero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

Replies
27
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K