MHB Prove $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}} < 2$

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}} < 2$. Participants explore various mathematical approaches and techniques to establish this result, emphasizing the need for a rigorous proof. The conversation highlights the importance of bounding the nested radical expressions effectively. Ultimately, the goal is to demonstrate that the entire expression remains less than 2, confirming the inequality. The conclusion reinforces the validity of the proposed inequality through mathematical reasoning.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
Prove that $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}}<2$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
Prove that $\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}}<2$.

Note that:
$$\sqrt{c + a} < b ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ c + a < b^2 ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ a < b^2 - c$$
For instance we have:
$$\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}}<2$$
$$\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}<3$$
$$\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}<7$$
$$\cdots$$
Unrolling the nested square roots as above, we must therefore show that:
$$\sqrt{2006} < ((((2^2 - 1)^2 - 2)^2 - 3)^2 - \cdots)^2 - 2005$$
Note that the sequence defined by $a_1 = 2$ and $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n$, corresponding to the sequence of RHS above, is increasing. We prove this by induction by showing that $a_n \geq n + 1$. First $a_1 = 2$ so the base case holds, now assume $a_n \geq n + 1$, then $a_n^2 - n \geq (n + 1)^2 - n$, that is, $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n \geq n^2 + n + 1 \geq (n + 1) + 1$ as $n^2 \geq 1$. By induction, $a_n \geq n + 1$ for all $n$. Thus we can now show that $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n \geq a_n$, as that is equivalent to $a_n^2 - a_n - n \geq 0$, and since $m^2 \geq 2m$ for all $\lvert m \rvert > 1$ it follows that $a_n^2 - a_ n - n \geq a_n - n \geq (n + 1) - n \geq 1 \geq 0$ and so $(a_n)_{n = 1}^\infty$ is increasing. Finally, the sequence becomes greater than $\sqrt{2006} \approx 44.788$ at $n = 4$ by simple arithmetic as $a_4 = 46$, which proves the claim. $\blacksquare$​
 
Last edited:
Bacterius said:
Note that:
$$\sqrt{c + a} < b ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ c + a < b^2 ~ ~ \iff ~ ~ a < b^2 - c$$
For instance we have:
$$\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}}<2$$
$$\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}}<3$$
$$\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2006}}<7$$
$$\cdots$$
Unrolling the nested square roots as above, we must therefore show that:
$$\sqrt{2006} < ((((2^2 - 1)^2 - 2)^2 - 3)^2 - \cdots)^2 - 2005$$
Note that the sequence defined by $a_1 = 2$ and $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n$, corresponding to the sequence of RHS above, is increasing. We prove this by induction by showing that $a_n \geq n + 1$. First $a_1 = 2$ so the base case holds, now assume $a_n \geq n + 1$, then $a_n^2 - n \geq (n + 1)^2 - n$, that is, $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n \geq n^2 + n + 1 \geq (n + 1) + 1$ as $n^2 \geq 1$. By induction, $a_n \geq n + 1$ for all $n$. Thus we can now show that $a_{n + 1} = a_n^2 - n \geq a_n$, as that is equivalent to $a_n^2 - a_n - n \geq 0$, and since $m^2 \geq 2m$ for all $\lvert m \rvert > 1$ it follows that $a_n^2 - a_ n - n \geq a_n - n \geq (n + 1) - n \geq 1 \geq 0$ and so $(a_n)_{n = 1}^\infty$ is increasing. Finally, the sequence becomes greater than $\sqrt{2006} \approx 44.788$ at $n = 4$ by simple arithmetic as $a_4 = 46$, which proves the claim. $\blacksquare$​

Well done, Bacterius, and thanks for participating!

Solution of other:

Let $X=\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2004+\sqrt{2005+\sqrt{2006}}}}}}$, note that $\sqrt{2005+\sqrt{2006}}<\sqrt{2005+46}<46$

$\therefore X<\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2004+46}}}}$

By the same token

$X<\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3+\cdots+\sqrt{2003+46}}}}$
$\vdots$

$X<\sqrt{1+\sqrt{2+\sqrt{3++46}}}=2$ and this completes the proof.
 
I have been insisting to my statistics students that for probabilities, the rule is the number of significant figures is the number of digits past the leading zeros or leading nines. For example to give 4 significant figures for a probability: 0.000001234 and 0.99999991234 are the correct number of decimal places. That way the complementary probability can also be given to the same significant figures ( 0.999998766 and 0.00000008766 respectively). More generally if you have a value that...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K