Prove that n(n+1) is never a square.

  • Thread starter Thread starter cragar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Square
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the expression n(n+1) is never a perfect square for n > 0. It establishes that n and n+1 are relatively prime, which implies that if n(n+1) were a square, both n and n+1 would need to be perfect squares. The proof demonstrates that no two perfect squares can differ by 1, leading to the conclusion that n(n+1) cannot be a square. The final argument utilizes the inequality n² < n(n+1) < (n+1)² to reinforce the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of basic number theory concepts, specifically prime numbers and perfect squares.
  • Familiarity with algebraic manipulation and inequalities.
  • Knowledge of mathematical proof techniques, including proof by contradiction.
  • Ability to work with natural numbers and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime numbers and their implications in number theory.
  • Learn about proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction and direct proof.
  • Explore the relationship between perfect squares and their differences.
  • Investigate inequalities in number theory, focusing on bounding expressions.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying properties of integers and perfect squares.

cragar
Messages
2,546
Reaction score
3

Homework Statement


Prove that n(n+1) is never a square for n>0

The Attempt at a Solution


n and n+1 are relatively prime because if they shared common factors then it should divide their difference but (n+1)-n=1 so 1 is their only common factor.
So the only possible way for n(n+1) to be a square is if n and n+1 are squares.
I will show that it is impossible to have perfect squares that are 1 apart.
Let x^2 and y^2 be squares that are 1 apart
so we have [itex]x^2-y^2=1=(x+y)(x-y)[/itex]
if x>y then x-y is at least 1 and x+y is bigger than 1 so this can't happen.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You wish to show:

##n^2 + n ≠ a^2, \quad a \in \mathbb{N}, a > 0##

Suppose by contradiction that ##n(n+1)## is a square. Then:

##n^2 + n = a^2##
##0 = a^2 - n^2 - n##

It must be the case that this equation is reliant on the relationship between ##a## and ##n##. That is, if ##a = n##, then the equation is zero only if ##n = 0##, which is a contradiction. What if ##n ≠ 0##? Look for two more contradictions.
 
Your proof is OK, but it might be easier to use the fact that ##n^2 < n(n+1) < (n+1)^2##.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K