MHB Prove that Q is not a finite set

  • Thread starter Thread starter issacnewton
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Finite Set
issacnewton
Messages
1,035
Reaction score
37
Hello

I am trying to prove that $\mathbb{Q}$ is not a finite set. I proceed with path of proof by contradiction. Suppose that $\mathbb{Q}$ is a finite set. Then $\exists\; n \in \mathbb{N}$ such that $I_n \sim \mathbb{Q}$, where
\[ I_n = \{i \in \mathbb{Z^{+}} |\; i \leq n\} \]

This means that there is a bijection from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $I_n$. Now since $\mathbb{N} \subseteq \mathbb{Q}$, we can pair first n numbers in $\mathbb{N}$ with n members in $I_n$. Let $n_1$ be the highest of these n numbers. Then $n_1 + 1 \in \mathbb{Q}$, but we can't pair this number with anyone in $I_n$ since we have exhausted all of them. This means that we can't have a function from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $I_n$, hence there is no bijection from $\mathbb{Q}$ to $I_n$. This is a contradiction. So $\mathbb{Q}$ is not a finite set.

Is this an ok proof ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi IssacNewton,

Yes, the proof is correct.
 
Thanks for verifying
 
We all know the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold uses open sets and homeomorphisms onto the image as open set in ##\mathbb R^n##. It should be possible to reformulate the definition of n-dimensional topological manifold using closed sets on the manifold's topology and on ##\mathbb R^n## ? I'm positive for this. Perhaps the definition of smooth manifold would be problematic, though.

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K