Prove that the angular momentum operator is hermitian

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the angular momentum operator is hermitian, initiated by defining the operator as \vec{L}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}. The user attempts to demonstrate this by taking the hermitian conjugate, but encounters confusion regarding the order of operations in the cross product, leading to an incorrect conclusion. It is clarified that reversing the order of the operators in the cross product introduces a negative sign, which is crucial for the proof. The user seeks guidance on how to properly denote this reversal in vector notation without losing clarity. Ultimately, the discussion emphasizes the importance of correctly applying the properties of hermitian operators and the rules of vector operations.
Septim
Messages
166
Reaction score
6
Greetings,

My task is to prove that the angular momentum operator is hermitian. I started out as follows:

\vec{L}=\vec{r}\times\vec{p}

Where the above quantities are vector operators. Taking the hermitian conjugate yields

\vec{L''}=\vec{p''}\times\vec{r''}

Here I have used double quotes to represent that the hermitian conjugate of the corresponding quantity.

\vec{L''}=\vec{p}\times\vec{r}

Here the fact that the momentum and position are hermitian operators were used. However
\vec{L''}=\vec{p}\times\vec{r}=-\vec{r}\times\vec{p}=-\vec{L}[

There has to be a flaw somewhere but I was not able to catch it, though I was able to prove that the angular momentum operator is hermitian when inspected component by component. I am yet to understand the error in the above derivation. Any help is appreciated.

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
L′′ = p′′ × r′′

The Hermitian conjugate reverses the operator order, but you've also reversed the order of the arguments to the cross product, which should bring in a minus sign.
 
Thanks for the reply. So as far as I am concerned you tell me that reversing the arguments of the cross product is superfluous. But how can I denote that I have reversed the orders of the operators without doing that? My point is to demonstrate that I have reversed the order of operators in vector notation.
 
Septim said:
Thanks for the reply. So as far as I am concerned you tell me that reversing the arguments of the cross product is superfluous. But how can I denote that I have reversed the orders of the operators without doing that? My point is to demonstrate that I have reversed the order of operators in vector notation.

In general, if \vec{A} and \vec{B} are operators, then (\vec{A} \times \vec{B})^\dagger = - \vec{B}^\dagger \times \vec{A}^\dagger
 
Time reversal invariant Hamiltonians must satisfy ##[H,\Theta]=0## where ##\Theta## is time reversal operator. However, in some texts (for example see Many-body Quantum Theory in Condensed Matter Physics an introduction, HENRIK BRUUS and KARSTEN FLENSBERG, Corrected version: 14 January 2016, section 7.1.4) the time reversal invariant condition is introduced as ##H=H^*##. How these two conditions are identical?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
910
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K