- #1

- 1,462

- 44

Is this a correct proof?

You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.

- I
- Thread starter Mr Davis 97
- Start date

- #1

- 1,462

- 44

Is this a correct proof?

- #2

- 16,436

- 15,481

Yes, but how?Let ##|x| = n## and ##|x^{-1}| = m##. So ##x^n = 1## and ##(x^{-1})^{m} = 1##. Both of these imply ...

How? I get ##n=am=a(bn)=(ab)n## and thus ##ab=1## resp. ##a=b=1## and so ##n=m##.... that ##x^m = 1## and ##(x^{-1})^n = 1##. Hence, ##n = am## and ##m = bn## for some ##a,b \in \mathbb{N}##. If we divide both equations we find that ##a = b##.

I could follow the first missing step in mind, but not the second. How did you get ##a=b\,? ##Therefore ##m/n = n/m \implies n^2 = m^2 \implies n = m##. Hence, ##x## and its inverse have the same order.

Is this a correct proof?

Share:

- Replies
- 3

- Views
- 3K