Prove the given equation that involves indices

  • Thread starter Thread starter chwala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Indices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an equation involving indices, specifically the expression $$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}}) = \frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$. Participants explore various approaches to manipulate the equation and question the validity of certain steps and assumptions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants share different methods of approaching the proof, including algebraic manipulation and questioning the necessity of certain transformations, such as multiplying by $a^{-2}$. Some suggest alternative forms of the equation for clarity.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and alternative perspectives. Some have offered clarifications regarding terminology related to indices and exponents, while others express confusion about the relevance of certain definitions in the context of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There are discussions about the implications of dividing by zero and the appropriate use of mathematical terminology, particularly the distinction between indices and exponents. Participants also note the importance of ensuring that assumptions about the variable $a$ are clear.

chwala
Gold Member
Messages
2,828
Reaction score
425
Homework Statement
Prove that;
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}}) = \frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$
Relevant Equations
understanding of indices
My approach;
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac {-2}{3}})
=(a-\frac {1}{a})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} +\frac {1}{a^{\frac {2}{3}}})
=(\frac{a^2-1}{a})(\frac{a^2+1}{a^{\frac {2}{3}}})
=\frac{a^4+a^2-a^2-1}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}}
=\frac{a^4-1}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}}$$
now at this point i multiplied both numerator and denominator by ##a^{-2}##
to realize;
$$\frac{a^4⋅a^{-2}-1⋅a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}⋅a^{-2}}=\frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$

Now to my question, is there a different way of proving this without bringing in ##a^{-2}##?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: Prove that;
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}}) = \frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$
Relevant Equations:: understanding of indices

My approach;
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac {-2}{3}})
=(a-\frac {1}{a})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} +\frac {1}{a^{\frac {2}{3}}})
=(\frac{a^2-1}{a})(\frac{a^2+1}{a^{\frac {2}{3}}})
=\frac{a^4+a^2-a^2-1}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}}
=\frac{a^4-1}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}}$$
now at this point i multiplied both numerator and denominator by ##a^{-2}##
to realize;
$$\frac{a^4⋅a^{-2}-1⋅a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {5}{3}}⋅a^{-2}}=\frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$

Now to my question, is there a different way of proving this without bringing in ##a^{-2}##?
Notice that ##\displaystyle \ \ \left(a^{(4/3)}+a^{(-2/3)}\right)= \left(a^{(\,(1/3)+1)}+a^{(\,(1/3)-1)}\right)##

##\displaystyle \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad = a^{1/3}\left(a+a^{-1}\right)##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: PeroK, Prof B, neilparker62 and 1 other person
An alternative, which is similar to SammyS's solution is to prove
chwala said:
Homework Statement:: Prove that;
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}}) = \frac {a^2-a^{-2}}{a^{\frac {-1}{3}}}$$
Relevant Equations:: understanding of indices

An alternative, which is similar to SammyS's suggestion, is to prove
$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}})a^{\frac{1}{3}} = a^2-a^{-2}$$
Since a can't be 0, you can then divide through by $a^\frac{1}{3}$

By the way, superscripts are usually called exponents. Subscripts are indices.
 
  • Skeptical
Likes   Reactions: chwala
Prof B said:
An alternative, which is similar to SammyS's solution is to prove

$$(a-a^{-1})(a^{\frac {4}{3}} + a^{\frac{-2}{3}})a^{\frac{1}{3}} = a^2-a^{-2}$$
Since a can't be 0, you can then divide through by $a^\frac{1}{3}$

By the way, superscripts are usually called exponents. Subscripts are indices.
I am not getting your point here...kindly elaborate how the knowledge of ##a≠0## will help in the problem...and why are you talking of superscripts and subscripts?
 
chwala said:
I am not getting your point here...kindly elaborate how the knowledge of ##a≠0## will help in the problem...and why are you talking of superscripts and subscripts?
I think it's because of the title of this thread versus what the actual topic is.

By the way, @Prof B is new to PF.
 
Prof B said:
you can then divide through by $a^\frac{1}{3}$
LaTeX here uses either two $ characters at each end for standalone equations/expressions, or two # characters at each end for inline equations/expressions.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: chwala
SammyS said:
I think it's because of the title of this thread versus what the actual topic is.

By the way, @Prof B is new to PF.
Maybe he needs some lessons on latex ...:biggrin:
 
chwala said:
Maybe he needs some lessons on latex ...:biggrin:
I should have been clearer in that reply. I was referring to his final comment which was about subscripts, superscripts, exponents, and indices.
 
SammyS said:
I should have been clearer in that reply. I was referring to his final comment which was about subscripts, superscripts, exponents, and indices.
He mentions that subscripts are indices... i am not getting that. Is that true? in my understanding i know that the term 'exponents, indices and power' can be used interchangeably in Mathematics to mean the same thing...it's true that a superscript may imply an exponent in a given math term ( e.g a variable or a number ).
 
  • #10
chwala said:
He mentions that subscripts are indices... i am not getting that. Is that true? in my understanding i know that the term 'exponents, indices and power' can be used interchangeably in Mathematics to mean the same thing...it's true that a superscript may imply an exponent in a given math term ( e.g a variable or a number ).
Take x cubed (x³) as an example. At an introductory level you will often find the superscript ‘3’ referred to as a power, an exponent or an index. Informally, these terms are used interchangeably, though using ‘index’ is not strictly correct.

The correct use of ‘index’ (pl. indices) is to identity a particular value in (for example) a list). Think of the index at the back of a book – each entry is a ‘pointer’.

E.g. you measure the heights of 4 people. You could call the individual values h₁, h₂, h₃ and h₄. There is one index and the numbers (1, 2, 3 and 4) are values of the index - written as subscripts.

You may be interested to know that (confusingly) at a more advanced level (e.g. tensors), indices can by written as superscripts!

E.g. the contravariant components of a vector v could be written as v¹, v², v³ and v⁴ but the numbers are not powers. They are values of an index - simply labels like the 1, 2, 3 and 4 for heights.

If you wanted, say, to cube the 2nd component of the above vector, you would write (v²)³.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: SammyS
  • #11
Steve4Physics said:
Take x cubed (x³) as an example. At an introductory level you will often find the superscript ‘3’ referred to as a power, an exponent or an index. Informally, these terms are used interchangeably, though using ‘index’ is not strictly correct.

The correct use of ‘index’ (pl. indices) is to identity a particular value in (for example) a list). Think of the index at the back of a book – each entry is a ‘pointer’.

E.g. you measure the heights of 4 people. You could call the individual values h₁, h₂, h₃ and h₄. There is one index and the numbers (1, 2, 3 and 4) are values of the index - written as subscripts.

You may be interested to know that (confusingly) at a more advanced level (e.g. tensors), indices can by written as superscripts!

E.g. the contravariant components of a vector v could be written as v¹, v², v³ and v⁴ but the numbers are not powers. They are values of an index - simply labels like the 1, 2, 3 and 4 for heights.

If you wanted, say, to cube the 2nd component of the above vector, you would write (v²)³.
Thanks @Steve4Physics ...but allow me to ask on why it was necessary in the context of the OP's question to define or rather re-define the terms subscript and superscripts i.e in post ##3##.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
Mark44 said:
LaTeX here uses either two $ characters at each end for standalone equations/expressions, or two # characters at each end for inline equations/expressions.
Thank you.
 
  • #13
chwala said:
I am not getting your point here...kindly elaborate how the knowledge of ##a≠0## will help in the problem
You can't divide by 0. You can divide by anything that isn't 0.

chwala said:
...and why are you talking of superscripts and subscripts?
Because exponents and indices are different things, so the words can't be used interchangeably. Steve4Physics gave a very good explanation.
 
  • #14
Prof B said:
Because exponents and indices are different things, so the words can't be used interchangeably. Steve4Physics gave a very good explanation.
You didn't read Steve4Physics's post closely enough, in which he said that exponents and indexes/indices are often used synonymously.

(Emphasis added...)
Steve4Physics said:
At an introductory level you will often find the superscript ‘3’ referred to as a power, an exponent or an index.
Additionally, I have noticed that European members here often use "index" in the same way that I would use "exponent." Tomato, tomahto...
 
Last edited:
  • #15
I am wondering why @Prof B keeps misreading posts...I have gone through his posts on other questions...I hope he's really not looking at physicsforums questions and phishing for solutions from other sites...then respond to same questions on the forum ...there's clearly a lack of keenness to details. Mythoughts...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 39 ·
2
Replies
39
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
862
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K