Prove the Hamiltonian Operator is Hermitian

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The Hamiltonian operator \(\hat{H} = -\left(\frac{\hbar}{2m} \frac{d^2}{dx^2} + V(x)\right)\) is proven to be Hermitian under the assumption that the potential energy function \(V(x)\) is real. The proof involves demonstrating that both the kinetic energy and potential energy components of \(\hat{H}\) satisfy the Hermitian condition. The process requires working within the Hilbert space \(L^2(\mathbb{R})\) and includes steps such as finding the domain of \(\hat{H}\), ensuring it is dense, and verifying the equality of ranges for \(\hat{H}\) and its adjoint \(\hat{H}^{\dagger}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Familiarity with the Hamiltonian operator and its components
  • Knowledge of partial integration techniques
  • Basic concepts of Hilbert spaces, specifically \(L^2(\mathbb{R})\)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hermitian operators in quantum mechanics
  • Learn about the implications of the Hamiltonian operator in quantum systems
  • Explore the process of finding adjoint operators in functional analysis
  • Review examples of partial integration in quantum mechanics proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of quantum mechanics, physicists working with operator theory, and anyone interested in the mathematical foundations of quantum systems will benefit from this discussion.

atay5510
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the Hamiltonian operator (\hat{H})=-((\hbar/2m) d2/dx2 + V(x)) is hermitian. Assume V(x) is real

Homework Equations



A Hermitian operator \hat{O}, satisfies the equation

<\hat{O}>=<\hat{O}>*

or

∫\Psi*(x,t)\hat{O}\Psi(x,t)dx = ∫\Psi(x,t)\hat{O}*\Psi*(x,t)dx between -∞ and +∞


The Attempt at a Solution



This is my first time using LaTex and I'm having trouble inputting what I want, but basically, I've just substituted the Hamiltonian operator for \hat{O}, into the second expression above. This is where I am stuck. I'm essentially left with two parts, one that's "telling" me to prove that the Kinetic Energy portion of H is Hermitian and another telling me to prove the Potential Energy portion is hermitian. However I can't seem to see how to do it.

Thanks

P.s. can you help with a solutio that does not use Bra-Ket notation, this question is in the section that precedes Dirac notation
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Working in the Hilbert space L2(R) one proceeds like this:

a) finds the domain of H.
b) checks if domain is dense everywhere in H.
c) finds the domain of H^{\dagger}
d) checks that the domain of H is included in the domain of its adjoint.
e) finally checks that the ranges of the 2 operators are equal for all vectors in the common domain (the domain of H).
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K