Proving Statistical Nature of $\hat{\rho}$ with Hermitian $\hat{H}$

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the operator ##\hat{\rho}=\frac{e^{-\beta\hat{H}}}{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}## is a statistical operator when the Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}## is Hermitian. Participants are exploring the properties of Hermitian operators and their implications for the statistical nature of ##\hat{\rho}##.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the Hermitian nature of ##\hat{\rho}## and its trace properties. There is an exploration of whether the exponential of a Hermitian operator remains Hermitian. Questions are raised about the reality of the parameter ##\beta## and its implications for the proof.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants confirming the reality of ##\beta## and providing insights into the properties of bounded operators. There is an acknowledgment of the significance of the density operator in the context of thermal ensembles.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the conditions under which the proof holds, particularly the boundedness of the Hamiltonian and the reality of the parameter ##\beta##.

LagrangeEuler
Messages
711
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


If Hamiltonian ##\hat{H}## is hermitian show that operator ##\hat{\rho}=\frac{e^{-\beta\hat{H}}}{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}## is statistical.

Homework Equations


In order to be statistical operator ##\hat{\rho}## must be hermitian and must have trace equal ##1##.
##Tr(\hat{\rho})=1##

The Attempt at a Solution


##\hat{\rho}^{\dagger}=\frac{e^{-\beta\hat{H}^{\dagger}}}{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}=\frac{e^{-\beta\hat{H}}}{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}=\hat{\rho}##
Not sure about this. If some operator is hermitian then I suppose also exponential function of this operator is also hermitian. Right?
##Tr(\hat{\rho})=\frac{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}{Tr(e^{-\beta\hat{H}})}=1##
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The solution is correct if βis real. Is it real?
 
Yes it is!
 
If H is bounded, then
$$\left(e^{-\beta\hat H}\right)^\dagger =\left(\lim_{n\to\infty}\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!}(-\beta\hat H)^k\right)^\dagger =\lim_{n\to\infty}\left(\sum_{k=0}^n \frac{1}{k!}(-\beta\hat H)^k\right)^\dagger =\dots =e^{-\beta\hat H^\dagger} =e^{-\beta\hat H}$$ The first equality is just the definition of the exponential of a bounded operator. The second follows from the fact that the ##\dagger## operation is a continuous function. The rest is easy.
 
Perhaps it's worth pointing out in passing that this is the world-famous density operator used for dealing with thermal ensembles :smile:
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K