Prove the sequence n/2^n converges to 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter naele
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequence
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The sequence defined by x_n = n/2^n converges to 0 as n approaches infinity. The Squeeze Theorem is applicable here, as it allows for bounding the sequence between two converging sequences. Specifically, for n ≥ 4, it has been established that 1/n > n/2^n > 0, which confirms that x_n is bounded below by 0 and monotonically decreasing. This leads to the conclusion that the sequence converges to 0.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the Squeeze Theorem
  • Familiarity with limits and convergence of sequences
  • Basic knowledge of mathematical induction
  • Experience with bounding sequences
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Squeeze Theorem in detail
  • Learn about proving convergence using mathematical induction
  • Explore the concept of monotonic sequences and their properties
  • Investigate the relationship between sequences and their limits, particularly using the ratio test
USEFUL FOR

Students studying calculus, particularly those focusing on sequences and series, as well as educators looking for examples of convergence proofs using the Squeeze Theorem.

naele
Messages
199
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show that x_n=\frac{n}{2^n} converges to 0

Homework Equations


Squeeze theorem?


The Attempt at a Solution


I've already proven that for n\geq 4, n^2 < 2^n which means that \frac{1}{n} < \frac{n}{2^n}. My desired approach is to use the squeeze theorem, but I cannot think of another sequence greater than n/2^n that would converge to 0.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can you show that (n + 1)/2n + 1 < n/2n for all n past some initial value? (Proof by induction?) If you can show this, and then use the fact that the sequence is bounded below (by zero), you have sequence that is monotonically decreasing and bounded below by 0, hence converges to 0.
 
You got the sign wrong. \frac{1}{n} &gt; \frac{n}{2^n} &gt; 0 for n>4. Next, apply the squeeze theorem.
you have sequence that is monotonically decreasing and bounded below by 0, hence converges to 0.

that's not enough. For example, 1+1/n is monotonically decreasing and it's bounded below by 0, but it does not converge to 0.
 
hamster143 said:
that's not enough. For example, 1+1/n is monotonically decreasing and it's bounded below by 0, but it does not converge to 0.
You got me. Mea culpa.
 
Thanks hamster, my teacher warned me against this kind of mistake too. Live and learn I guess :)
 
If x_{n+1}/x_n has limit r< 1 then you can "compare" the sequence to r^n.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K