MHB Prove the trig inequality ∑α∈{A,B,C}1/[1+sin(α/2)]≥2

  • Thread starter Thread starter lfdahl
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Trig
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the inequality for any triangle, specifically that the sum of the reciprocals of \(1 + \sin(\alpha/2)\) for angles A, B, and C is greater than or equal to 2. Participants express appreciation for each other's solutions, particularly highlighting contributions from MarkFL. There is a request for alternative solutions that do not rely on cyclic symmetry. Additional approaches to the problem are also mentioned, indicating a collaborative effort to explore various methods of proof. The conversation emphasizes the mathematical challenge and the community's engagement in finding solutions.
lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove, that for any triangle:

\[\sum_{\alpha \in \left \{ A,B,C \right \}}\frac{1}{1+\sin \frac{\alpha }{2}}\geq 2\]
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
My solution:

We have the objective function:

$$f(A.B,C)=\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{A}{2}\right)}+\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{B}{2}\right)}+\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{C}{2}\right)}$$

Subject to the constraint:

$$g(A,B,C)=A+B+C-\pi=0$$

We see by cyclic symmetry that the critical value occurs at:

$$A=B=C=\frac{\pi}{3}$$

And we find:

$$f\left(\frac{\pi}{3},\frac{\pi}{3},\frac{\pi}{3}\right)=\frac{3}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{\pi}{6}\right)}=2$$

Using another point on the constraint, we find:

$$f\left(\frac{\pi}{6},\frac{\pi}{3},\frac{\pi}{2}\right)\approx2.04684845753400>2$$

Thus, we may assert:

$$f_{\min}=2$$

Shown as desired. :D
 
Well done, MarkFL! Thankyou for your participation!

Your response came before my ink dried ;)

May I also ask the forum participants for a solution without the use of cyclic symmetry? :o
 
Here's another solution:

Using the AM-GM inequality, we may state:

$$\frac{1}{3}\sum_{k=1}^3\left(\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{\theta_k}{2}\right)}\right)\ge\sqrt[3]{\prod_{k=1}^3\left(\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{\theta_k}{2}\right)}\right)}$$

We have that equality occurs for:

$$\theta_1=\theta_2=\theta_3=\frac{\pi}{3}$$

Hence:

$$\frac{1}{3}\sum_{k=1}^3\left(\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{\theta_k}{2}\right)}\right)\ge\frac{2}{3}$$

Or:

$$\sum_{k=1}^3\left(\frac{1}{1+\sin\left(\dfrac{\theta_k}{2}\right)}\right)\ge2$$

Shown as desired. :D
 
Thanks a lot, MarkFL, for a very fine solution!A third approach can be found here:

Note, that the function $\frac{1}{1+\sin x}$ is convex on $[0;\frac{\pi}{2}]$, and that the angles: $\frac{A}{2}$, $\frac{B}{2}$, $\frac{C}{2}$ all belong to the same interval.
Using Jensen´s inequality:

\[\frac{1}{1+\sin \frac{A}{2}}+\frac{1}{1+\sin \frac{B}{2}}+\frac{1}{1+\sin \frac{C}{2}} \geq \frac{3}{1+\sin \left (\frac{\frac{A}{2}+\frac{B}{2}+\frac{C}{2}}{3} \right ) }= \frac{3}{1+\sin 30^{\circ}}=2\]
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top