MHB Prove Theorem: Probability of A Subset B is Less than B

AI Thread Summary
To prove the theorem that if A is a subset of B, then the probability of A is less than or equal to the probability of B, the user begins by applying the properties of probability functions. They express P(B) as the sum of the probabilities of disjoint events, leading to the conclusion that P(B) is greater than or equal to P(A). The discussion also emphasizes the need to reference specific axioms of probability, including non-negativity, the certainty of events, and the additivity of mutually exclusive events. For the second part of the theorem, the user seeks clarification on how to express the difference between B and A in terms of unions to apply the axioms effectively. The conversation highlights the importance of foundational axioms in proving probability theorems.
Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
How do I prove the following theorem?

If $A \subset B$ then $P(A) \le P(B)$ and $P(B-A) = P(B)-P(A)$

$A$ and $B$ are events and $P$ is the probability function.

What I tried (but not sure if it's right or not):

$P(B) = P((B\setminus A) \cup (B \cap A)) = P(B\setminus A)+P(B \cap A) \ge 0+P(B \cap A) \ge P(A) $

Therefore $P(B) - P(A) \ge 0$. Hence $P(B) \ge P(A)$.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Guest said:
How do I prove the following theorem?

If $A \subset B$ then $P(A) \le P(B)$ and $P(B-A) = P(B)-P(A)$

$A$ and $B$ are events and $P$ is the probability function.

What I tried (but not sure if it's right or not):

$P(B) = P((B\setminus A) \cup (B \cap A)) = P(B\setminus A)+P(B \cap A) \ge 0+P(B \cap A) \ge P(A) $

Therefore $P(B) - P(A) \ge 0$. Hence $P(B) \ge P(A)$.

Hi Guest! ;)

It looks right to me.
You may want to list the axioms you're using though.
There is some context missing, which is different in every textbook on the subject.
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Guest! ;)

It looks right to me.
You may want to list the axioms you're using though.
There is some context missing, which is different in every textbook on the subject.
Hi, I like Serena. :D Thanks for the reply.

I'm using the following three axioms:

Axiom 1: For every event $A$ in the class $C$,

$$P(A) \ge 0$$

Axiom 2: For the sure or certain event $S$ in the class $C$,

$$P(S) = 1$$

Axiom 3: For any number of mutually exclusive events $A_1, A_2,\cdots$, in the class C,

$$P(A_1 \cup A_2 \cup \cdots) = P(A_1)+P(A_2) +\cdots $$

How do I prove the second part of the theorem?

I know that $P(B-A) = P(B \cap A')$ but I don't know how to turn the intersection into union so that I can use axiom 3.
 
How about $B=(B-A)\cup A$?
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top