Prove u(A/E)=0 for Compact Hausdorff Spaces and Borel Measure

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Fermat1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Compact Measure
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion establishes that for a compact Hausdorff space K and a Borel measure u, if A is an open set disjoint from a closed set E, then u(A) equals zero. It further demonstrates that for any Borel set A, the measure u(AE) equals u(A), where AE represents the intersection of A and E. The proof hinges on showing that u(A/E) equals zero, leveraging the properties of Borel sets and the compactness of K. The conclusion confirms that the measures μ and ν, defined as μ(A) and μ(A ∩ E), are equal under these conditions.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Borel measures in topology
  • Familiarity with compact Hausdorff spaces
  • Knowledge of set operations and their implications on measures
  • Concept of outer regularity in measure theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Borel measures in detail
  • Explore the implications of compactness in measure theory
  • Learn about the relationship between open and closed sets in topology
  • Investigate outer regularity and its applications in measure theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in measure theory and topology, as well as graduate students studying advanced concepts in functional analysis and related fields.

Fermat1
Messages
180
Reaction score
0
Let K be a compact hausdorff space, and u a borel measure on K. You are given that if A is an open set in K with A and E disjoint, we have u(A)=0. (E is a certain closed set in K)
Show that for a borel set A, we have that u(AE)=u(A), where AE is the intersection.

we have that u(A)=u(AE)+u(A\E) so we only have to prove u(A/E)=0

u(A/E)=inf(u(M):M is open and A\E is a subset of M)

A\E is disjoint with E but unfortunately this does not imply M is disjoint with E .
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Fermat said:
Let K be a compact hausdorff space, and u a borel measure on K. You are given that if A is an open set in K with A and E disjoint, we have u(A)=0. (E is a certain closed set in K)
Show that for a borel set A, we have that u(AE)=u(A), where AE is the intersection.

we have that u(A)=u(AE)+u(A\E) so we only have to prove u(A/E)=0

u(A/E)=inf(u(M):M is open and A\E is a subset of M)

A\E is disjoint with E but unfortunately this does not imply M is disjoint with E .
This argument seems too simple to be believable, but I can't see what's wrong with it (I'm suspicious, because it does not use the compactness of $K$). You are given that $E$ is closed, so its complement $K\setminus E$ is an open set disjoint from $E$. Therefore $u(K\setminus E) = 0.$ If $A$ is a Borel set then $u(A\setminus E) \leqslant u(K\setminus E) = 0$.
 
Is the last part simply because A\E is a subset of K\E?
 
Fermat said:
Is the last part simply because A\E is a subset of K\E?
Yes. If $X$, $Y$ are Borel sets with $X\subseteq Y$ then $u(X)\leqslant u(Y)$.
 
Indeed, in the use of outer regularity, there is a problem as the involved $M$ may not be disjoint with $E$.

We have to show that the measures $\mu$ and $\nu\colon A\mapsto \mu(A\cap E)$ are actually equal.

Since the ambient space is compact, we can assume that $\mu$ is finite. We only have to check that the relationship $\mu(A)=\mu(A\cap E)$ holds for $A$ an open set. Using closeness of $E$, $A\cap E^c$ is an open set disjoint with $E$.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K