MHB Prove Zeros & Poles of Meromorphic Function Have No Limit Point

  • Thread starter Thread starter Amer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the zeros and poles of a meromorphic function do not have a limit point. It begins by assuming that the set of poles has a limit point, leading to a contradiction based on the definition of isolated points and the analyticity of the function. The argument shows that if a pole is approached, the function cannot remain analytic in the neighborhood, contradicting the initial assumption. The conversation also touches on the isolation of zeros in analytic functions, reinforcing the idea that both zeros and poles are isolated. The proof's validity is questioned, with references to additional resources for clarification.
Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Prove that the zeros and the poles of a meromorphic function dose not have a limit point

Solution:
Let P be the set of the poles of f suppose that it has a limit point.
p is a pole of f so it is an isolated point such that \lim_{z \rightarrow p} \mid f(z) \mid= \infty
from isolated point definition there exist an R>0 such that f is analytic at the set B={z : 0<|z-p|<R }
but B is open and p in B, and B intersect U\{p} is not phi so f is not analytic at B
Contradiction

what about the set of zeros, and is my proof right ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for useful link :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K