Proving 2-Norm of A: Understanding the Relationship Between u and v

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter GridironCPJ
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Confusing Proof
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the relationship between the 2-norm of a matrix \( A = uv^T \) and the 2-norms of the vectors \( u \) and \( v \). Participants explore the definitions of norms, specifically the 2-norm and the Frobenius norm, and how they apply to vectors and matrices. The conversation includes technical reasoning and clarification of concepts related to matrix multiplication and norms.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express confusion about whether \( u \) and \( v \) should be treated as vectors or matrices, with one participant suggesting \( v \) might be a collection of vectors.
  • Others clarify that \( u \) and \( v \) can be treated as vectors, leading to the formation of an \( m \times n \) matrix through their outer product.
  • There is a discussion about the definitions of the 2-norm for matrices and vectors, with one participant mentioning the Frobenius norm as a potential point of confusion.
  • Some participants note that the proof involves the 2-norm of \( A \) and highlight the distinction between the 2-norm and the Frobenius norm.
  • One participant questions how to proceed with the proof without knowledge of the eigenvalues of the rank 1 matrix.
  • Another participant mentions the variability in definitions of norms and expresses uncertainty about the terminology used in the course.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally agree that the discussion involves different interpretations of norms and their applications. However, there is no consensus on the definitions being used or the approach to proving the relationship between the norms.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include varying definitions of norms, potential misunderstandings regarding matrix multiplication, and the lack of clarity on the terminology used in the course. The discussion does not resolve these ambiguities.

GridironCPJ
Messages
44
Reaction score
0
I don't understand how you're supposed to prove this:

Let A=uvT (vT = v transpose) where u is in R^M and v is in R^N. Prove 2-norm of A = 2 norm of v * 2 norm of u.

I'm not sure if I'm supposed to look at v and u as vectors or what. If they are just vectors, this does not make any sense. I'm assuming the only way this is even possible is if v is a collection of m different vectors each of length n, which would just make v a matrix. Am I missing something here?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It does make sense if u and v are vectors. The product
$$\begin{bmatrix} u_1 \\ u_2 \\ \cdots \\ u_m \end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix} v_1 & v_2 & \cdots & u_n \end{bmatrix}$$ is an m-by-n matrix.

Since there is nothing special about u and v, the only thing you have to work with here is the definition of the 2-norm. Start by multiplying out the matrix, and writing down the values of the three 2-norms.
 
AlephZero said:
It does make sense if u and v are vectors. The product
$$\begin{bmatrix} u_1 \\ u_2 \\ \cdots \\ u_m \end{bmatrix}
\begin{bmatrix} v_1 & v_2 & \cdots & u_n \end{bmatrix}$$ is an m-by-n matrix.

Since there is nothing special about u and v, the only thing you have to work with here is the definition of the 2-norm. Start by multiplying out the matrix, and writing down the values of the three 2-norms.

I see what you mean, I was looking at u as a row vector rather than a column vector, which makes multiplication impossible. I multiplied out the matrix, but I'm stuck from here. I can't really use the 2-norm of a matrix since I don't know any of the eigenvalues. What is your tip from here? I didn't quite know what you meant by the "three 2-norms."
 
Last edited:
Ahh ... there are too many different definitions of "norm"!

I took the question as meaning the 2-norm of a matrix is
$$\sqrt{\sum_i \sum_j |a_{ij}|^2 }$$
and the 2-norm of a vector is
$$\sqrt{\sum_i |a_{i}|^2 }$$
(i.e. the Frobenius norm). By "the three 2-norms" I just meant the 2-norms of the two vector, and the matrix.
 
AlephZero said:
Ahh ... there are too many different definitions of "norm"!

I took the question as meaning the 2-norm of a matrix is
$$\sqrt{\sum_i \sum_j |a_{ij}|^2 }$$
and the 2-norm of a vector is
$$\sqrt{\sum_i |a_{i}|^2 }$$
(i.e. the Frobenius norm). By "the three 2-norms" I just meant the 2-norms of the two vector, and the matrix.

The 2-norm of a matrix is different from the Frobenius norm of a matrix and the proof involves the 2-norm of A, which is a matrix. If the proof were to show equality of the Frobenius norm and the product of the two vector norms, this would make more sense. However, it's for the 2-norm of A.
 
GridironCPJ said:
I can't really use the 2-norm of a matrix since I don't know any of the eigenvalues."

You have a rank 1 matrix and you don't know any of the eigenvalues?
 
GridironCPJ said:
The 2-norm of a matrix is different from the Frobenius norm of a matrix and the proof involves the 2-norm of A, which is a matrix.

I can think of several definitions of a norm that could be reasonably be called "the 2-norm of a matrix". I can only say what I think the question means, because I don't know what terminology your course is using.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K