Proving a complex wave satisfies Helmholtz equation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a complex wave, represented by the function $$\Psi (x, t) = U(x, y, z) e^{-i \omega t}$$, satisfies the Helmholtz equation. The focus is on the function $$U(x, y, z)$$, referred to as the complex amplitude, and its relationship to the Helmholtz equation $$ (\nabla + k^2) U (x, y, z) = 0 $$.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to express $$U$$ in terms of $$\Psi$$ and $$e^{-i \omega t}$$ but encounters difficulties in deriving a result that satisfies the Helmholtz equation. They express confusion regarding the role of the $$k$$ component and suggest that proving the expression equals zero might imply $$U = 0$$.
  • Some participants question how the property of $$\Psi$$ being a harmonic wave can be utilized and what equation $$\Psi$$ satisfies.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with some participants exploring the implications of the harmonic wave property and its relevance to the problem. There is no explicit consensus, but a participant indicates they have made progress in understanding the equation that $$\Psi$$ satisfies.

Contextual Notes

The original poster notes that all important information is provided in the problem statement, suggesting that there may be constraints on additional resources or information available for solving the problem.

Matt Chu
Messages
16
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Consider a harmonic wave given by

$$\Psi (x, t) = U(x, y, z) e^{-i \omega t}$$

where ##U(x, y, z)## is called the complex amplitude. Show that ##U## satisfies the Helmholtz equation:

$$ (\nabla + k^2) U (x, y, z) = 0 $$

Homework Equations



Everything important already in the problem.

The Attempt at a Solution


[/B]
The first thing I attempted to do was to express ##U## in terms of ##\Psi## and ##e^{-i \omega t}##. This led me to a long set of derivations that in no way gave me anything remotely close to zero. I'm confused as to how to solve this, as the ##k## component of the Helmholtz equation seems to be problematic; it seems the only way to prove that the whole expression equals zero would be if ##U = 0##.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello Matt,

How do you make use of the given that ##\Psi## is a harmonic wave ? What equation does ##\Psi## satisfy ?
 
BvU said:
Hello Matt,

How do you make use of the given that ##\Psi## is a harmonic wave ? What equation does ##\Psi## satisfy ?

Yeah, just figured that out a few minutes ago.
 
Good! makes it an easy exercise.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K