Proving a Determinant Identity for Beginners

  • Thread starter Thread starter Vishalrox
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Determinants Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving a determinant identity using properties of determinants without expanding the determinant itself. The identity compares a determinant of a 3x3 matrix with a product of three expressions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss various row and column operations attempted to simplify the determinant. Some question the effectiveness of specific operations and whether they lead to a clearer path towards the proof. Others express frustration over the complexity of the problem and seek a more systematic approach.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes attempts to manipulate the determinant through row and column operations, with some participants suggesting alternative strategies. There is a recognition of potential errors in the expressions involved, as one participant provides counterexamples indicating that the claimed result may not hold true.

Contextual Notes

One participant notes that they are not working on this problem as a homework assignment but rather as a math enthusiast. The discussion also highlights the importance of verifying the correctness of the expressions before proceeding with the proof.

Vishalrox
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
1. The problem

Prove that

| (a+b-c) (-c+a-b) (a+b+c) |
| (a-c) (c-a) (b-a) | = (a+b-c)(-c+a-b)(a-c)
| (a-b) (a-c) (a+b) |

using properties of determinants without expanding a determinant

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried a lot of ways like with following steps C(3) -> C(3) + C(2) , R(1) -> R(1) + R(2) ,
R(1) -> R(1) + R(2) - R(3)...but i could get nothing...its not my homework sum...i am just a 7th grade maths enthusiast...i saw this sum somewhere...i tried to solve this but couldn't get...can anyone help me up to solve this...or atleast guide me...where C(1) means column 1 and R(1) means Row 1 and similar things to that
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
(a+b-c) (-c+a-b) (a+b+c) |
| (a-c) (c-a) (b-a) | = (a+b-c)(-c+a-b)(a-c)
| (a-b) (a-c) (a+b) |
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}a+b- c & -c+a-b & a+b+c \\ a-c & c-a & b-a \\ a-b & a-c & a+b\end{array}\right|

"C(3) -> C(3) + C(2)". Okay, that gives
\left|\begin{array}{ccc}a+b- c & -c+a-b & 2a \\ a-c & c-a & b+c-2a \\ a-b & a-c & 2a+b-c\end{array}\right|

But may I ask why you did that? How does it improve the situation?

Notice that the right side, (a+b-c)(-c+a-b)(a-c), is a product of three numbers, one of which is the upper left element of the determinant. The determinant of a diagonal or triangular matrix is just the product of the numbers on the main diagonal so I would recommend using row operations to change all numbers below the main diagonal to 0. For example, changing R2 to R2- (a-c)/(a+b-c)R1 will make the second row of the first column equal to 0.
 
that was one of the steps i did...i tried with many properties meddled with this a lot...but couldn't get a thing...instead of what you said i would just add R(2) and R(3) and get a 0..(R2 -> R2 + R3)...so that's aint the problem...u will get zeros...bu the problem gets more complicated i u proceed...so what i want is...a stock algorithm to get the answer...
 
Last edited:
Vishalrox said:
1. The problem

Prove that

| (a+b-c) (-c+a-b) (a+b+c) |
| (a-c) (c-a) (b-a) | = (a+b-c)(-c+a-b)(a-c)
| (a-b) (a-c) (a+b) |

using properties of determinants without expanding a determinant

2. The attempt at a solution

I tried a lot of ways like with following steps C(3) -> C(3) + C(2) , R(1) -> R(1) + R(2) ,
R(1) -> R(1) + R(2) - R(3)...but i could get nothing...its not my homework sum...i am just a 7th grade maths enthusiast...i saw this sum somewhere...i tried to solve this but couldn't get...can anyone help me up to solve this...or atleast guide me...where C(1) means column 1 and R(1) means Row 1 and similar things to that


The claimed result is false. Let D denote the determinant and R the expression on the right. When a=1, b=2, c=3 we have D = 16 but R = 0. When a=-1, b=0, c=2 we have D = 24 but R = -27.

There must be something wrong with the expressions you wrote.

RGV
 
Thanks, Ray. I didn't check.
 
Oh thanks...
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K