Proving a function is greater than zero

  • Thread starter Thread starter Buri
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Zero
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the function f(x,y) = x^p/p + y^q/q - xy is non-negative for x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0, given the condition 1/q + 1/p = 1. The user attempts to show that the minimum occurs on the line x = y^(q-1), where the function equals zero. They derive a single-variable function h(y) and find its derivative, leading to the conclusion that the minimum occurs at the (q-1)th root of x. The user expresses uncertainty about the positivity of h at this point but believes the approach is valid. The conversation highlights the complexity of proving the inequality and the potential for miscalculations in the analysis.
Buri
Messages
271
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement

I'd like to show that:

f(x,y) = x^p/p + y^q/q - xy ≥ 0 where 1/q + 1/p = 1 and x ≥ 0 and y ≥ 0.

The attempt at a solution

What I'm actually trying to do is show that the minimum is on the line x = y^(q-1) at which the function takes on 0. But proving its actually always ≥ 0 is something that's causing me problems. Is there some inequality that could maybe lead me to a solution? I've tried considering lines in the plane like y = kx, but that doesn't lead me to anywhere. Any help?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We first take x fixed and we consider the function

h(y)=\frac{x^p}{p}+\frac{y^q}{q}-xy

The derivative of this function

h^\prime(y)=y^{q-1}-x

So the minimum of h is in in (q-1)th root of x. So all we need to prove is that

h(\sqrt[q-1]{x})=\frac{x^p}{p}+\frac{x^{\frac{q}{q-1}}}{q}-x^{\frac{q}{q-1}}=\frac{x^p}{p}-\frac{q-1}{q}x^{\frac{q}{q-1}}}

is positive. But since 1/p+1/q=1, we get that the above is equal to 0, and thus always positive.

It could be that I miscalculated somewhere, but I do think that this would be the technique to proving the inequality...
 
I've worked through it all and it doesn't seem like you did any miscalculations. Is it perfectly sound though? I don't know, but considering the single variable function is something I'm a bit iffy about (I'd think twice about it), but maybe it's just something clever to do.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
934
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K