Define T: F^2 --> P_1(F) by T(a, b) = a + bx (with P_1 denoting P sub 1)(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I usually prove problems such as this by constructing a matrix of T using bases for the vector spaces and then proving that the matrix is invertible, but is the following also a viable proof that T is an isomorphism? I know it is not finished, but is it a step in the right direction?

let T(z) = m + nx (T(z) is contained in P_1(F))

so z = (m, n) (z is an element of F^2)

this means that that the general form for all elements in P_1(F) has a pre-image in F^2, which means that T is onto(?), so therefore T is invertible and F^2 is isomorphic to P_1(F).

Is this any start at all? Any suggestions?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Proving a linear transformation is an isomorphism

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proving linear transformation | Date |
---|---|

I Proving a set is linearly independant | Apr 14, 2017 |

I Proving a lemma on decomposition of V to T-cyclic subspace | Mar 16, 2017 |

I Proving an inverse of a groupoid is unique | Jan 1, 2017 |

Proving a transformation is not linear | Jun 9, 2013 |

Proving a Linear Transformation is Onto | Mar 8, 2013 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**