Proving a properties of fibonacci numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the property of Fibonacci numbers defined as p[n]: f_{n+1} * f_{n-1} - (f_{n})^{2} = (-1)^{n} using mathematical induction. The proof employs regular (weak) induction, demonstrating both the base and inductive steps effectively. The consensus is that weak induction suffices for this proof, as every valid proof with weak induction is also valid with strong induction. No additional proof by strong induction is necessary.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fibonacci numbers and their properties
  • Knowledge of mathematical induction, including base and inductive steps
  • Familiarity with sequences and series in mathematics
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore advanced properties of Fibonacci numbers, such as Binet's formula
  • Learn about strong induction and its applications in proofs
  • Investigate other sequences and their properties using similar proof techniques
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, educators, students studying number theory, and anyone interested in proofs involving Fibonacci numbers and induction methods.

John112
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Let p[n] be the following property of Fibonacci numbers:
p[n]: f_{n+1} * f_{n-1} - (f_{n})^{2} = (-1)^{n}. Prove p[n] by induction.

This is the proof I wrote. i used regular induction. Is weak induction sufficient to prove it or do I need to prove this by strong induction?

proof:

BASE STEP: p[1]: f_{2} * f_{0} - (f_{1})^{2} = (1 * 0) - 1 = -1

and (-1)^{1} = -1

INDUCTIVE STEP:

assume P[k]: f_{k+1} * f_{k-1} - (f_{k})^{2} = (-1)^{k}

show p[k+1]: f_{k+2} * f_{k} - (f_{k+1})^{2} = (-1)^{k+1}
We know f_{k+2} = f_{k+1} + f_{k}

p[K+1]: f_{k+2} * f_{k} - (f_{k+1})^{2} = (-1)^{k+1}

substitute f_{k+2} = f_{k+1} + f_{k} into p[k+1]

p[k+1]: (f_{k+1} + f_{k}) * f_{k} - (f_{k+1})^{2} = (-1)^{k+1}

= f_{k} * f_{k+1} + (f_{k})^{2} - (f_{k+1})^{2}

We know p[k]: f_{k+1} * f_{k-1} - (f_{k})^{2} = (-1)^{k}

We can rewrite p[k] as: (f_{k})^{2} = f_{k+1} * f_{k-1} - (-1)^{k}

We substitue (f_{k})^{2} from p[k] into the (f_{k})^{2} in p[k+1] = f_{k+1} + f_{k} + f_{k+1} * f_{k-1} - (-1)^{k} - f_{k+1}^{2})

= f_{k+1} (f_{k+1} + f_{k}) (-1)^{k} - f_{k+1}^{2})

= (f_{k+1})^{2}) - (-1)^{k} - (f_{k+1})^{2})

= - ((-1)^{k})

= (-1)^{k+1}Does this proof strong enough or would I have to do this by strong induction? If by strong induction, how do I got about proving it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Every valid proof with weak induction is a valid proof with strong induction, too (and this is the first time I saw specific words for them). Your proof uses valid steps only, therefore it is valid. There is no need to do more.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K