Proving a property of the dirac delta function

Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving the property of the Dirac Delta Function, specifically the theorem that states $$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta'(x-a)dx=-f'(a)$$ using integration by parts. Participants explore the integration process, starting with the application of integration by parts and expressing the integral in terms of the delta function. There is confusion regarding the evaluation of the boundary terms and the remaining integral involving the derivative of the function. Ultimately, a breakthrough occurs when one participant realizes that substituting the derivative function simplifies the integral, leading to a clearer understanding of the problem. The conversation highlights the challenges and insights involved in working with the Dirac Delta Function in mathematical proofs.
skate_nerd
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove this theorem regarding a property of the Dirac Delta Function:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta'(x-a)dx=-f'(a)$$
(by using integration by parts)

Homework Equations


We know that δ(x) can be defined as
$$\lim_{\sigma\to\infty}(\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2\sigma^2}})$$
and another proper of the Dirac Delta Function is
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta(x-a)dx=f(a)$$
Also, δ(x-a)=0 when x is not equal to a, and δ(x-a) is undefined when x=a. (Not really sure how to interpret the second part of that statement quite yet, I understand that it is because the two sided limit of σ->0 doesn't exist, but I don't see how to picture that graphically)

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting with
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta'(x-a)dx=-f'(a)$$
I tried integration by parts, taking u=f(x) so u'=f'(x), and then v'=δ'(x-a) so v=δ(x-a), translating our original integral to
$$f(x)\delta(x-a) (from -\infty to \infty)-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f'(x)\delta(x-a)dx$$
I'm really not sure where to go next. I don't see what else I can do with evaluating the first part from negative infinity to infinity, and I don't see anything more I can do with the remaining integral. All in all I don't see how integration by parts was helpful at all.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
hi skate_nerd! :smile:
skate_nerd said:
$$f(x)\delta(x-a) (from -\infty to \infty)-\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f'(x)\delta(x-a)dx$$
I'm really not sure where to go next. I don't see what else I can do with evaluating the first part from negative infinity to infinity

(i'm not convinced that that part of the formula is valid :redface:, but anyway …)

what are δ(∞ - a) and δ(-∞ - a) ?

…, and I don't see anything more I can do with the remaining integral.

can't you apply the delta definition directly to it?
 
Thanks for the reply tiny tim. I see what you are saying about the first part of the formula I reached. However for the second part, if I applied the definition of the delta function I would have a very odd integral that I would really have no idea how to solve.
 
uhh? the definition is …
skate_nerd said:
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f(x)\delta(x-a)dx=f(a)$$

and you want to find …
$$\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}f'(x)\delta(x-a)dx$$
 
Yeah but how does knowing that first definition help with that second integral? I don't see any way to use that to solve the second integral...
 
You do realize that f' is just another function, right?
 
Yes, I think its quite obvious i am aware of that since I used that fact when I integrated by parts...
 
Am I just making this harder than it needs to be or what? I honestly am really stuck here and I've been thinking about this problem since last night
 
Let g(x)=f'(x). Now the integral becomes
$$\int f'(x)\delta(x-a)\,dx = \int g(x)\delta(x-a)\,dx = ?$$
 
  • #10
Ahhhhh wow okay that totally makes sense now. Thank you vela. I guess for some reason I was thinking that if you substituted something that way it would be like a change of variable but it actually isn't. I kept trying to use the definition
$$\lim_{\sigma\to0}(\frac{1}{\sigma\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{-\frac{x^2}{2\sigma^2}})$$
but integrating something like that is a lot more difficult than it sounds...
 

Similar threads

Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
19
Views
3K