Proving a Subgroup: Homework Statement

  • Thread starter Thread starter STEMucator
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
4 replies · 2K views
Messages
2,076
Reaction score
140

Homework Statement



I got this question from contemporary abstract algebra :

http://gyazo.com/7a9e3f0603d1c0dcfde256e7b05276cd

Homework Equations



One step subgroup test :
1. Find my defining property.
2. Show that my potential subgroup is non-empty.
3. Assume that we have some a and b in our potential subgroup.
4. Prove that ab-1 is in our potential subgroup.

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Defining property : xh = hx for x in G and for all h in H.
2. C(H) ≠ ∅ because the identity element e is in C(H) and satisfies xe = ex.
3. Suppose a and b are in C(H), then xa = ax and xb = bx.

4. Show that ab-1 is in H whenever a and b are in H. So we want : xab-1 = ab-1x

Start with :

xa = ax
x(ab-1) = (ax)b-1
x(ab-1) = (xa)b-1
x(ab-1) = x(ab-1)
x(ab-1) = (ab-1)x

I know this is probably horribly wrong, but for some reason I can't seem to see how to do this properly. Any help would be appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Zondrina said:

Homework Statement



I got this question from contemporary abstract algebra :

http://gyazo.com/7a9e3f0603d1c0dcfde256e7b05276cd

Homework Equations



One step subgroup test :
1. Find my defining property.
2. Show that my potential subgroup is non-empty.
3. Assume that we have some a and b in our potential subgroup.
4. Prove that ab-1 is in our potential subgroup.

The Attempt at a Solution



1. Defining property : xh = hx for x in G and for all h in H.
2. C(H) ≠ ∅ because the identity element e is in C(H) and satisfies xe = ex.
3. Suppose a and b are in C(H), then xa = ax and xb = bx.

4. Show that ab-1 is in H whenever a and b are in H. So we want : xab-1 = ab-1x

Start with :

xa = ax
x(ab-1) = (ax)b-1
x(ab-1) = (xa)b-1
x(ab-1) = x(ab-1)
x(ab-1) = (ab-1)x

I know this is probably horribly wrong, but for some reason I can't seem to see how to do this properly. Any help would be appreciated.

You skipped a step. You need to show that if bx=xb then b^(-1)x=xb^(-1). You can't just assume it.
 
Dick said:
You skipped a step. You need to show that if bx=xb then b^(-1)x=xb^(-1). You can't just assume it.

Ahhhh so it would be a sort of two step thing here.

First we want to show xb-1 = b-1x. So :

xb = bx
b-1xbb-1 = b-1bxb-1
b-1xe = exb-1
b-1x = xb-1

Now we can show that xab-1 = ab-1x. So :

xa = ax
x(ab-1) = a(xb-1)
x(ab-1) = (ab-1)x
 
Zondrina said:
Ahhhh so it would be a sort of two step thing here.

First we want to show xb-1 = b-1x. So :

xb = bx
b-1xbb-1 = b-1bxb-1
b-1xe = exb-1
b-1x = xb-1

Now we can show that xab-1 = ab-1x. So :

xa = ax
x(ab-1) = a(xb-1)
x(ab-1) = (ab-1)x

Yes, that's it.