Having all subgroups normal is isomorphism invariant

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

A group is defined as Hamiltonian if every subgroup is a normal subgroup. The discussion proves that being Hamiltonian is an isomorphism invariant by demonstrating that if a group \( G \) is isomorphic to a group \( H \), then the normality of subgroups is preserved. Two key lemmas are established: the first shows that if the preimage of a subgroup under an isomorphism is a subgroup, then the subgroup itself is normal; the second confirms that if the preimage is normal, the original subgroup is also normal. The conclusion is that all subgroups of \( H \) are normal if all subgroups of \( G \) are normal.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically Hamiltonian groups.
  • Familiarity with isomorphisms in group theory.
  • Knowledge of subgroup properties and normal subgroups.
  • Basic grasp of homomorphisms and their properties.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Hamiltonian groups in greater detail.
  • Explore the implications of isomorphism in group theory.
  • Learn about the structure and examples of normal subgroups.
  • Investigate the relationship between subgroup properties and group homomorphisms.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, group theorists, and students studying advanced group theory concepts.

Mr Davis 97
Messages
1,461
Reaction score
44

Homework Statement


A group is called Hamiltonian if every subgroup of the group is a normal subgroup. Prove that being Hamiltonian is an isomorphism invariant.

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


Let ##f## be an isomorphism from ##G## to ##H## and let ##N \le H##. First we prove two lemmas:

Lemma 1): If ##f^{-1}(N) \le G## then ##N \le H##.

Let ##a,b \in N##. Then since ##f## is surjective, ##a=f(x)## and ##b=f(y)## for some ##x,y \in f^{-1}(N)##. Then ##ab^{-1} = f(x)f(y)^{-1} = f(xy^{-1}) \implies xy^{-1} = f^{-1}(ab^{-1})##. In the previous step we used the fact that ##f## is a homomorphism and that ##f## is injective. Now, since ##x,y \in f^{-1}(N)## and ##f^{-1}(N)## is a subgroup, we have that ##xy^{-1} \in f^{-1}(N)##. So ##f^{-1}(ab^{-1} \in f^{-1}(N)##. By definition of the preimage, this means that ##f(f^{-1}(ab^{-1})) \in N \implies ab^{-1} \in N##. So ##N \le H##.

Lemma 2): If ##f^{-1}(N) \trianglelefteq G## then ##N \trianglelefteq H##.

Here we use lemma 2 and suppose that ##N \le H##. We want to show that ##\forall h \in H##, ##hNh^{-1} \subseteq N##. So, let ##h\in H## and ##n \in N##. Since ##f## is surjective, ##h = f(y)## for some ##y \in G## and ##n=f(x)## for some ##x \in f^{-1}(N)##. Then ##hnh^{-1} = f(y)f(x)f(y)^{-1} = f(xyx^{-1}) \implies yxy^{-1} = f^{-1}(hnh^{-1})##. But ##f^{-1}(N) \trianglelefteq G##, so ##yxy^{-1} \in f^{-1}(N)##. Hence ##f^{-1}(hnh^{-1}) \in f^{-1}(N)##. By definition of the preimage, this implies that ##hnh^{-1} \in N##. We conclude that ##N \trianglelefteq H##.

Finally, we prove the main result, that if all of the subgroups of ##G## are normal, and if ##G## is isomorphic to ##H##, then all of the subgroups of ##H## are normal.

Let ##N## be a subgroup of ##H##. We know that the preimage of a subgroup is also a subgroup, so ##f^{-1}(N) \le G##. But all of the subgroups of ##G## are normal, so ##f^{-1}(N) \trianglelefteq G##. By lemma 2, we then know that ##N \trianglelefteq H##, and we are done.

NOTE: Perhaps this argument would have been easier if I supposed that ##f : H \to G## were the isomorphism.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In this case you really do merely need two lines:
Mr Davis 97 said:
##xy^{-1} \in f^{-1}(N)##. So ##f^{-1}(ab^{-1} \in f^{-1}(N)##.
and
Then ##hnh^{-1} = f(y)f(x)f(y)^{-1} = f(xyx^{-1}) \implies yxy^{-1} = f^{-1}(hnh^{-1})##.
Let me write it a bit easier. Say ##f\, : \,G \longrightarrow H## is an isomorphism and ##N \trianglelefteq G## and ##n,m \in N, g \in G, h=f(g)\in H\,.##

Then ##f(n)f(m)^{-1}=f(nm^{-1}) \in f(N)## shows the subgroup property, and ##hf(N)h^{-1}=f(gNg^{-1}) \subseteq f(N)## shows normality. That's all.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Mr Davis 97

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K