MHB Proving a Vector in $\Bbb R^2$ is of the Form $au+bv$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niamh1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Vector
Click For Summary
Every vector in $\Bbb R^2$ can be expressed as a linear combination of two vectors, specifically in the form $au + bv$ where $u = (0, 1)$ and $v = (1, 0)$. This representation holds true for any vector in $\Bbb R^2$, as any point can be described by its coordinates. The discussion highlights that if vectors $u$ and $v$ are orthogonal, the conditions for finding coefficients $a$ and $b$ are straightforward. However, if they are not orthogonal, the existence of a unique solution for the coefficients depends on the determinant condition $u_1v_2 - v_1u_2 \neq 0$. Thus, the ability to express a vector as a combination of two others is fundamentally linked to their linear independence.
Niamh1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
Let $a, b \in \Bbb R$ and $u, v \in \Bbb R^2$, with $u = (0, 1)$ and $v = (1, 0)$. Show that every vector in $\Bbb R^2$ is of the form $au + bv$. Under what conditions is this true for general vectors $u = (u_1, u_2)$ and $v = (v_1, v_2)$?

No idea where to begin. Would appreciate any help.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Any point in $\mathbb{R}^2$ can be described as the coordinates of the tip of a vector. As any vector can be the hypotenuse of the triangle formed by such a vector and two perpendicular vectors (with either $a$ or $b$ being $0$ if our vector is vertical or horizontal), we can describe any vector with the vector sum given.

What if $<u_1,u_2>$ and $<v_1,v_2>$ are orthogonal? What if they are not orthogonal?

Does that help?
 
Let $w=(w_1,w_2)$ be an arbitrary vector. With your notation, when can you find $a,\,b$ with $w=au+bv$. That is the system in unknowns a and b has a (unique) solution:
$$u_1a+v_1b=w_1$$
$$u_2a+v_2b=w_2$$

Since this is linear algebra you should know that the answer is that the determinant $u_1v_2-v_1u_2\neq0$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K