Proving an eigenfunction (EF) from Lx as combination of EF of Lz

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Start your own thread to ask a follow-up.
6 replies · 3K views
sunrah
Messages
191
Reaction score
22

Homework Statement


Show that the eigenfunction of Lx can be written as a combination of eigenfunctions from Lz with the same l but different m. Using the eigenfunction
[itex]Y_{x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(Y^{-1}_{1} - Y^{1}_{1})[/itex] as the eigenfunction of Lx

Homework Equations



[itex]Y^{m}_{l} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}e^{im\varphi}[/itex] eigenfunction of Lz
[itex]L_{z}Y^{m}_{l}= l Y^{m}_{l}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]Y_{x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(Y^{-1}_{1} - Y^{1}_{1}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} - e^{i\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x} = i \frac{h}{2\pi}(sin\theta \frac{d}{d\varphi} + cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{d}{d\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x}Y_{x} = i \frac{h}{2\pi}cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{d}{d\varphi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} - e^{i\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x}Y_{x} = \frac{h}{2\pi}cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} + e^{i\varphi}) ≠ lY_{x}[/itex]

can't see where I'm going wrong
 
Physics news on Phys.org
sunrah said:

Homework Statement


Show that the eigenfunction of Lx can be written as a combination of eigenfunctions from Lz with the same l but different m. Using the eigenfunction
[itex]Y_{x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(Y^{-1}_{1} - Y^{1}_{1})[/itex] as the eigenfunction of Lx

Homework Equations



[itex]Y^{m}_{l} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2 \pi}}e^{im\varphi}[/itex] eigenfunction of Lz
The line above is your problem. ##e^{i m \varphi}## is an eigenfunction of Lz, but the spherical harmonic ##Y^m_l## is an eigenfunction of both Lz and L2.

[itex]L_{z}Y^{m}_{l}= l Y^{m}_{l}[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution


[itex]Y_{x} = \frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(Y^{-1}_{1} - Y^{1}_{1}) = \frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} - e^{i\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x} = i \frac{h}{2\pi}(sin\theta \frac{d}{d\varphi} + cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{d}{d\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x}Y_{x} = i \frac{h}{2\pi}cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{d}{d\varphi}\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} - e^{i\varphi})[/itex]

[itex]\widehat{L}_{x}Y_{x} = \frac{h}{2\pi}cot\theta cos\varphi\frac{1}{\sqrt{4\pi}}(e^{-i\varphi} + e^{i\varphi}) ≠ lY_{x}[/itex]

can't see where I'm going wrong
 
vela said:
The line above is your problem. ##e^{i m \varphi}## is an eigenfunction of Lz, but the spherical harmonic ##Y^m_l## is an eigenfunction of both Lz and L2.

Hi, should I be using

[itex]Y^{m}_{l} \propto P^{m}_{l}(cos\theta)e^{i m \varphi}[/itex] ?
 
vela said:
Yes.

just to confirm is

[itex]P^{-1}_{1}(cos\theta) = cos\theta[/itex]

thanks!
 
No, that's not correct. Don't you have a list of spherical harmonics in your textbook? If not, just google it.
 
thank you no I wasn't aware of spherical harmonics, but i am now!