MHB Proving Area Ratio of Equilateral Triangle Divided by Line

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that when a line divides an equilateral triangle into two regions with equal perimeters, the ratio of their areas, A1 and A2, satisfies the inequality 7/9 ≤ A1/A2 ≤ 9/7. Participants share their approaches to the proof, emphasizing the geometric properties of the triangle and the implications of equal perimeter. Acknowledgment is given to contributors for their solutions and methods. The conversation highlights the interplay between geometry and area ratios in equilateral triangles. The focus remains on the mathematical proof and its implications within the context of triangle geometry.
anemone
Gold Member
MHB
POTW Director
Messages
3,851
Reaction score
115
A line divides an equilateral triangle into two parts with the same perimeter and having areas $A_1$ and $A_2$ respectively. Prove that $\dfrac{7}{9} \le \dfrac{A_1}{A_2} \le \dfrac{9}{7}$.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
anemone said:
A line divides an equilateral triangle into two parts with the same perimeter and having areas $A_1$ and $A_2$ respectively. Prove that $\dfrac{7}{9} \le \dfrac{A_1}{A_2} \le \dfrac{9}{7}$.
my solution :
View attachment 1735
if DE is not parallel to BC the discussion is similar (x+y=0.5 must hold)
 

Attachments

  • 9 over 7.jpg
    9 over 7.jpg
    23.9 KB · Views: 124
anemone said:
A line divides an equilateral triangle into two parts with the same perimeter and having areas $A_1$ and $A_2$ respectively. Prove that $\dfrac{7}{9} \le \dfrac{A_1}{A_2} \le \dfrac{9}{7}$.
another solution :
 

Attachments

  • ratio of two areas.jpg
    ratio of two areas.jpg
    24.5 KB · Views: 113
Thanks for participating and well done, Albert! For your second method, I recall vaguely seeing you used pretty much quite similar way to target other type of geometry problem.:cool:

Solution proposed by Vishal Lama, Southern Utah University:
Let's name the triangle be triangle ABC. WLOG, let the triangle has the unit side length of 1.The line can divide the triangle into two congruent triangles or into a triangle and a quadrilateral or . If the line cuts the triangle in two congruent triangles, then clearly $\dfrac{A_1}{A_2}=1$.

For the second case, we may assume that the line cuts side $AB$ at $D$ and $AC$ at $E$. Let the area of triangle $ADE=A_1$ and the area of quadrilateral $BDEC=A_2$. Then $A_1+A_2=\dfrac{1}{2}(1)(1)(\sin 60^{\circ})=\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}$.

Let $BD=x$ and $CE=y$. Then $AD=1-x$, $AE=1-y$. Since the regions with areas $A_1$ and $A_2$ have equal perimeter, we must have $BD+BC+CE+AD+AE$.

$\therefore x+1+y=(1-x)+(1-y) \rightarrow x+y=\dfrac{1}{2}$

Now, area of triangle $ADE=A_1=\dfrac{1}{2}(AD)(AE)\sin \angle DAE$,

$A_1=\dfrac{1}{2}(1-x)(1-y)\sin 60^{\circ} \rightarrow A_1=\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}(1-x)(\dfrac{1}{2}+x)$

Denote $k=\dfrac{A_2}{A_1}>0$, we get that

$\dfrac{A_1}{A_1+A_2}=\dfrac{\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}(1-x)(\dfrac{1}{2}+x)}{\dfrac{\sqrt{3}}{4}}=(1-x)(\dfrac{1}{2}+x)=\dfrac{1}{1+k}$

which after simplification yields

$2x^2-x+\dfrac{1-k}{1+k}=0$

The above quadratic equation in $x$ has real roots and the discriminant should be greater than or equal to zero. Thus,

$D=1-4\cdot2\cdot\left( \dfrac{1-k}{1+k} \right)=\dfrac{9k-7}{k+1} \ge 0$

Therefore $k \ge \dfrac{7}{9}$ or $\dfrac{A_2}{A_1} \ge \dfrac{7}{9}$.

Changing the notations, area of triangle $ADE=A_2$ and area of quadrilateral $BDEC=A_1$ we get $\dfrac{A_1}{A_2} \ge \dfrac{7}{9}$.

Thus,

$\dfrac{7}{9} \le \dfrac{A_1}{A_2} \le \dfrac{9}{7}$.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top