Proving b_m ≥ ∑b_i^2 Under Given Conditions

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter fmilano
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conditions
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
1 reply · 2K views
fmilano
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Hi, I need to show this:

[tex]b_m \geq\sum_{i=1}^n b_i^2[/tex]

given these three conditions:

[tex]b_m \geq b_i[/tex], for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] (in other words [tex]b_m = max(b_i)[/tex]) and

[tex]0 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex] for [tex]i=1..n[/tex] and

[tex]\sum_{i=1}^n b_i=1[/tex]

I've been working for hours in this without results...Any clue would be really appreciated

(this is not a homework exercise. I'm just trying to convince myself that the bayes decision error bound is a lower bound for the nearest neighbor rule error bound, and to convince myself of that I've arrived at the conclusion that I have to show the above).

Thanks,

Federico
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Maybe this will help . . .

[tex]0 \leq b_{i}^2 \leq b_i \leq 1[/tex], this implies that [tex]\sum_{i = 1}^n b_{i}^2 \leq \sum_{i = 1}^n b_i = 1[/tex].