Proving Bijection Between X and Y: Tips & Examples

  • Thread starter Thread starter estra
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bijection
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a relation R is a bijection between two sets X and Y, specifically under the conditions that R−1R= I: X→X and RR−1=I: Y→Y. Participants express their challenges with understanding set theory concepts, particularly bijections and the definitions of inverse relations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of the inverse relation R−1 and question how to define it without assuming R is a bijection. There are attempts to clarify the relationship between R and its inverse, as well as the implications of R being a subset of X x Y.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of the definitions and properties of bijections and inverse relations. Some participants are seeking guidance on how to demonstrate the required properties of R and R−1, while others are questioning the assumptions being made in the proofs.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express a lack of familiarity with set theory, indicating that this is a new topic for them. There is also mention of needing examples or tips to improve understanding, which suggests that the discussion is taking place in a homework help context.

estra
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Prove that R ⊂ X x Y is a bijection between the sets X and Y, when R−1R= I: X→X and RR-1=I: Y→Y

Set theory is a quite a new lesson for me. So I am not good at proving different connections, but please give me a little help with what to start and so.. I have read the book and I know what bijection means but just..
I would be very very thankful. Getting a good example proof or just some tips what to do would improve my skills also I hope :)

Thank you in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
How do you define R^{-1} without assuming R is a bijection (and thus has an inverse)?
 
I only know that if R ⊂ X x Y then R-1 ⊂ Y x X
or: (y,x)\inR-1 \Leftrightarrow (x,y) \in R
 
But that is undefined for specific y if there is no pair with that y in the second position.

And it is not uniquely defined if there is more than one pair with that y in the second position.
 
OK. Let's assume that R \subset X x Y is a bijection between X and Y.
Then we also have to have R-1. What is R-1 ⊂ Y x X
when i: X → X then (x,y)\inR has to be written (f(x),x) \in R and x \in X and also (f-1)y,y \in R and x \in X.
but how to show that R-1R=I abd RR-1=I ?
or do we have to write R={(x,x)| x\inR } R-1={(x,x)| x\in R} and
R={(y,y)| y\inR } R-1={(y,y)| y\inR }

please somebody help me here :)
Thank you!
 
OK. Let's assume that R \subset X x Y is a bijection between X and Y.
Then we also have to have R-1. What is R-1 ⊂ Y x X
when i: X → X then (x,y)\inR has to be written (f(x),x) \in R and x \in X and also (f-1)y,y \in R and x \in X.
but how to show that R-1R=I abd RR-1=I ?
or do we have to write R={(x,x)| x\inR } R-1={(x,x)| x\in R} and
R={(y,y)| y\inR } R-1={(y,y)| y\inR }

please somebody help me here :)
Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K