Proving Bounds on |1+x| when |x-1|<d

  • Thread starter Thread starter ImAnEngineer
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounds
AI Thread Summary
For every d>0, if |x-1|<d, it can be shown that |1+x|<2+d. The discussion explores the implications of the distance of x from 1 and -1, using the triangle inequality to establish the relationship. When x is less than 1, it is closer to -1 than d, while if x is greater than 1, its distance to -1 is two units plus the distance to 1. The triangle inequality is applied to demonstrate that |1+x| is indeed less than d+2. This confirms the original statement without additional restrictions on d.
ImAnEngineer
Messages
209
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show the following for every d>0:
For every real number x with |x-1|<d it follows that |1+x|<2+d

2. The attempt at a solution
If x-1>0, then |x-1|=x-1<d. Hence x+2 = |x+2| < 2+d.
If x-1<0, then |x-1|=-(x-1)<d. Hence x-1>-d => x+1 > 2-d ...??

Is this really possible to do without putting any other restrictions on d?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let me answer your last question first.

|x - 1| < d means, that the distance of x to 1 is no more than d. Now what is the distance of x to -1? Well, if x is "to the left" of 1, then it is definitely closer to -1 than d. For example, if x is at the maximal distance from 1, namely 1 - d, then it has distance 1 - (1 - d) = d to -1.
If x is on the other side of 1, its distance to -1 is equal to two units plus the distance to 1.

If you use the idea that you can measure the distance of x to -1 by going "to 1" first, you hopefully see how the triangle inequality comes in useful.
 
Ah of course, the triangle inequality in one dimension :) (not really a triangle)
|a-c|\leq |a-b|+|b-c|

If I choose: a=1, b=-1, c=x

|1-x|\leq|1+1|+|-1-x|=2+|1+x|&lt;d
So surely:
|1+x|&lt;d+2

Thank you!
 
I tried to combine those 2 formulas but it didn't work. I tried using another case where there are 2 red balls and 2 blue balls only so when combining the formula I got ##\frac{(4-1)!}{2!2!}=\frac{3}{2}## which does not make sense. Is there any formula to calculate cyclic permutation of identical objects or I have to do it by listing all the possibilities? Thanks
Since ##px^9+q## is the factor, then ##x^9=\frac{-q}{p}## will be one of the roots. Let ##f(x)=27x^{18}+bx^9+70##, then: $$27\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)^2+b\left(\frac{-q}{p}\right)+70=0$$ $$b=27 \frac{q}{p}+70 \frac{p}{q}$$ $$b=\frac{27q^2+70p^2}{pq}$$ From this expression, it looks like there is no greatest value of ##b## because increasing the value of ##p## and ##q## will also increase the value of ##b##. How to find the greatest value of ##b##? Thanks
Back
Top