MHB Proving Co-Prime Numbers in Sets of Five

  • Thread starter Thread starter kaliprasad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numbers Sets
kaliprasad
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
1,333
Reaction score
0
show that in a set of any 5 consecutive numbers there is at least one number that is co-prime to all the rest 4 (for example (2,3,4,5,6- 5 is co-prime to 2,3,4,6)
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Reducing modulo $5$, we see that it's enough to consider $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$ as any $5$ consecutive integers form a complete residue system. Since the observation is true for $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$, it is true for all case. QED.
 
mathbalarka said:
Reducing modulo $5$, we see that it's enough to consider $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$ as any $5$ consecutive integers form a complete residue system. Since the observation is true for $\{1, 2, 3, 4, 5\}$, it is true for all case. QED.

I am not convinced about the solution can you clarify it
 
because we have 5 consecutive number the largest difference is 4. so if there is a common factor between 2 numbers of the 5 it has to be <=4. So a common prime factor has to be 2 or 3.

now in a set of 5 consecutive numbers one of the numbers has to be of the form 6n + 1 or 6n - 1 which is neither divisible by 2 nor 3. so it is co-prime to rest of the 4.
 
Last edited:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top