MHB Proving coercivity for weak form

  • Thread starter Thread starter Carla1985
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Form Weak
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the coercivity of the bilinear form \( a(u,v) \) in the context of the weak form of the Poisson equation. The key point is that coercivity is established if there exists a constant \( c \) such that \( |a(v,v)| \ge c\|v\|^2 \) for all \( v \in V \). Participants highlight the importance of the Poincaré inequality, which provides the necessary constant \( C \) such that \( a(u,u) = \|\nabla u\|_{L^2(\Omega)}^2 \ge C\|u\|^2 \). The conditions on the domain \( \Omega \) and the function spaces for \( u \) and \( v \) are also noted as critical for the proof. The conversation emphasizes the relationship between the bilinear form and the norms in the context of weak solutions.
Carla1985
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
I have the weak form of the poisson equation as $a(u,v)=l(v)$ where
$$a(u,v)=\int_\Omega \bigtriangledown u\cdot\bigtriangledown v$$

I have been proving existence and uniqueness of the solution using the Lax-Milgram Thm. I am stuck on proving that the bilinear form $$a(u,v)$$ is coercive. I have that it is coercive if there exists a constant c such that
$$|a(u,v)|\leq c||v||_V\ \ \forall\ v\in V$$
where $||\cdot||_V$ is the norm corresponding to scalar product $(\cdot,\cdot)_V$.

I think I need to use the Poincare inequality to solve it but not sure how. Could someone please give me tips on how to go about proving this please? Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Carla1985,

There are pieces of information that are missing in your question. What are the conditions on $\Omega$? In what space do $u$ and $v$ belong to? Also, in the definition of coercivity, you should have $|a(v,v)| \ge c\|v\|^2$ for all $v\in V$.
 
Euge said:
Hi Carla1985,

There are pieces of information that are missing in your question. What are the conditions on $\Omega$? In what space do $u$ and $v$ belong to?

I have my spaces as:
$$u\in U:=\{u\in H^1(\Omega)\ |\ u=g_D\textsf{ on }\partial\Omega_D\}$$
$$v\in V:=\{v\in H^1(\Omega)\ |\ v=0\textsf{ on }\partial\Omega_D\}$$

Euge said:
Also, in the definition of coercivity, you should have $|a(v,v)| \ge c\|v\|^2$ for all $v\in V$.

Yes sorry, that's what I should have typed :)
 
The coercivity of $a$ follows directly from the Poincare inequality, for there is a constant $C = C(\Omega)$ such that $a(u,u) = \|\nabla u\|_{L^2(\Omega)}^2 \ge C\|u\|^2$ for all $u\in H^1(\Omega)$.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top