Proving Contractive Homework: Tips & Solutions

  • Thread starter Thread starter JasMath33
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    calculus
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a function is contractive, which is a key concept in fixed-point theorems. Participants are exploring the implications of previous homework assignments and the application of Banach's fixed-point theorem in this context.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the necessity of proving the function's contractiveness and the relevance of previous homework. Questions arise regarding the interpretation of specific statements and the application of theorems, such as Banach's fixed-point theorem.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of different approaches to the problem. Some participants express confusion about specific statements, while others clarify the connection to Lipschitz continuity and the conditions for applying the fixed-point theorem. Guidance has been offered regarding the use of elementary methods to establish contractiveness.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through assumptions related to Lipschitz constants and the implications of previous exercises. There is a mention of constraints regarding the continuity of derivatives and the conditions under which the fixed-point theorem can be applied.

JasMath33
Messages
21
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I worked on this question and I made it so far, and now I am stuck on how to finish it. Here is the problem and below I will explain what I attempted.

upload_2016-7-6_8-41-4.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution


I know looking at the last part about using previous homework, I want to prove that the function is contractive. If I can prove that, I can use a previous assignment which says contractive functions have a fixed point. Here is what I have in my proof so far.
upload_2016-7-6_8-43-44.png


I am stuck now and not completely sure where to go next. Any advice is appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't understand what your last line in the picture means. Nevertheless, are you allowed to apply Banach's fixed-point theorem?
 
fresh_42 said:
I don't understand what your last line in the picture means. Nevertheless, are you allowed to apply Banach's fixed-point theorem?

Yes I could use that theorem. Would I just need to completely erase everything I did and start over?

I was getting the last part from using the previous homework problems below.

upload_2016-7-6_10-33-2.png
 
JasMath33 said:
Yes I could use that theorem. Would I just need to completely erase everything I did and start over?
So you are already done. The other exercise (Lipschitz continuity for ##f## on the condition on ##f'##) showed you that ##b## is your Lipschitz constant. Since ##b<1, \; f## is a contraction and the fixed-point theorem applies.
 
What other exercise are you talking about? I am lost on that statement. I understand the reasoning afterwards.
 
fresh_42 said:
So you are already done. The other exercise (Lipschitz continuity for ##f## on the condition on ##f'##) showed you that ##b## is your Lipschitz constant. Since ##b<1, \; f## is a contraction and the fixed-point theorem applies.
I think you are looking at the proof I found in the book and asked about. I get it now.
 
Mean value theorem: ##|f(x) - f(y)| = f'(t) |x-y| < b |x-y|##, i.e. ##f## is a contraction because ##b<1##.
 
fresh_42 said:
Mean value theorem: ##|f(x) - f(y)| = f'(t) |x-y| < b |x-y|##, i.e. ##f## is a contraction because ##b<1##.
Thanks I see it now. I forgot I could use that. Thanks.
 
JasMath33 said:
Thanks I see it now. I forgot I could use that. Thanks.

Even easier: just use very elementary methods. If ##|f'(t)| \leq m## on ##R## (or an an interval ##[a,b]##), that means that ##-m \leq f'(t) \leq m##. Thus, for ##x_1 < x_2## we have
f(x_2) - f(x_1) = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} f&#039;(t) \, dt \leq \int_{x_1}^{x_2} m \, dt = m (x_2 - x_1)
and
f(x_2) - f(x_1) = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} f&#039;(t) \, dt \geq \int_{x_1}^{x_2} (-m) \, dt = -m (x_2 - x_1)
Thus, ##|f(x_2) - f(x_1)| \leq m |x_2 - x_1|##.
 
  • #10
Ray Vickson said:
Even easier: just use very elementary methods. If ##|f'(t)| \leq m## on ##R## (or an an interval ##[a,b]##), that means that ##-m \leq f'(t) \leq m##. Thus, for ##x_1 < x_2## we have
f(x_2) - f(x_1) = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} f&#039;(t) \, dt \leq \int_{x_1}^{x_2} m \, dt = m (x_2 - x_1)
and
f(x_2) - f(x_1) = \int_{x_1}^{x_2} f&#039;(t) \, dt \geq \int_{x_1}^{x_2} (-m) \, dt = -m (x_2 - x_1)
Thus, ##|f(x_2) - f(x_1)| \leq m |x_2 - x_1|##.
That works too. Thanks.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K