Proving $\displaystyle\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = 0$ with Closed Curve

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter WMDhamnekar
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Closed Curve
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the line integral $\displaystyle\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = 0$ for the vector field $\vec{F} = \frac{yi + xj}{x^2 + y^2}$ along a simple closed curve C that does not enclose the origin. It is established that the proposition is incorrect due to the non-zero curl of $\vec{F}$, specifically $\nabla \times \vec{F} = -\frac{2(x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2} \hat{k}$. A counterexample using a positively oriented square reveals that the integral does not equal zero, confirming that $\vec{F}$ is not a conservative vector field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically line integrals.
  • Knowledge of conservative vector fields and potential functions.
  • Familiarity with the concept of curl in vector fields.
  • Ability to compute integrals and gradients in two dimensions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of conservative vector fields and their potential functions.
  • Learn how to compute the curl of vector fields in detail.
  • Explore examples of line integrals in different vector fields.
  • Investigate the implications of Green's Theorem in relation to closed curves and vector fields.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physics students, and anyone studying vector calculus, particularly those interested in the properties of vector fields and line integrals.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
If C is the simple closed curve in the xy plane not enclosing the origin, how to prove that $\displaystyle\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} =0 $ where $$ F= \frac{yi +xj}{x^2+y^2}$$

How to answer this question? Any math help will be accepted. I am working on this question. If any member of Math help board know the correct answer, may reply.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This proposition is incorrect, since the curl of $\vec{F}$ is nonzero. For a concrete counterexample, let C be the positively oriented square in the plane with vertices $(1,0), (2,0), (2,1)$, and $(1,1)$. A direct computation shows $\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} ≠ 0$.
 
Euge said:
This proposition is incorrect, since the curl of $\vec{F}$ is nonzero. For a concrete counterexample, let C be the positively oriented square in the plane with vertices $(1,0), (2,0), (2,1)$, and $(1,1)$. A direct computation shows $\int_C \vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} ≠ 0$.

1656398339229.png

A real valued function F(x,y) such that $\nabla {F(x,y)}=f(x,y)$ is called potential for f. A conservative vector field is one which has a potential.

Now, in our problem, we have to show that $\vec{F} =\frac{yi +xj}{x^2+y^2}$ is a conservative vector field (It has a potential).
Thus, a potential $\mathcal{F(x,y)}$ for $F(x,y) = \frac{yi}{x^2+y^2} + \frac{xj}{x^2+y^2}$ exists, namely,
$$ \arctan{(\frac{x}{y})} + \arctan{(\frac{y}{x})}.$$

You can verify in your example that the value of line integral F along any curve C going from (1,0) to (2,0) or from (2,0) to (2,1) or from (2,1) to (1,1) and finally from (1,1) to (1,0) will always be zero. Since by above given theorem
$$\displaystyle\int_C\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \mathcal{F} (2,0) - \mathcal{F} (1,0) = \arctan{(\frac20)} + \arctan{(\frac02)} - \arctan{(\frac10)}-\arctan{(\frac01)} = \frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\pi}{2} =0$$
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
View attachment 11853
A real valued function F(x,y) such that $\nabla {F(x,y)}=f(x,y)$ is called potential for f. A conservative vector field is one which has a potential.

Now, in our problem, we have to show that $\vec{F} =\frac{yi +xj}{x^2+y^2}$ is a conservative vector field (It has a potential).
Thus, a potential $\mathcal{F(x,y)}$ for $F(x,y) = \frac{yi}{x^2+y^2} + \frac{xj}{x^2+y^2}$ exists, namely,
$$ \arctan{(\frac{x}{y})} + \arctan{(\frac{y}{x})}.$$

You can verify in your example that the value of line integral F along any curve C going from (1,0) to (2,0) or from (2,0) to (2,1) or from (2,1) to (1,1) and finally from (1,1) to (1,0) will always be zero. Since by above given theorem
$$\displaystyle\int_C\vec{F}\cdot d\vec{r} = \mathcal{F} (2,0) - \mathcal{F} (1,0) = \arctan{(\frac20)} + \arctan{(\frac02)} - \arctan{(\frac10)}-\arctan{(\frac01)} = \frac{\pi}{2} -\frac{\pi}{2} =0$$
A potential function exists if and only if the curl of the vector field is zero. Here we have [math]\nabla \times \left ( \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{i} + \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{j} \right ) = - \dfrac{2 (x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2} \hat{k}[/math].

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
A potential function exists if and only if the curl of the vector field is zero. Here we have [math]\nabla \times \left ( \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{i} + \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} \hat{j} \right ) = - \dfrac{2 (x^2 - y^2)}{(x^2 + y^2)^2} \hat{k}[/math].

-Dan
$\nabla \times \bigg(\frac{y}{x^2+y^2}, \frac{x}{x^2+y^2},0\bigg)= \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \hat{i} (0 - 0) +\hat{j} (0 - 0) + \hat{k} \bigg(\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2} -\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\bigg)= 0 $

My computation of curl of conservative vector field is zero. How is that?(Bigsmile)(Clapping)
 
Last edited:
Dhamnekar Winod said:
$\nabla \times \bigg(\frac{y}{x^2+y^2}, \frac{x}{x^2+y^2},0\bigg)= \begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix} = \hat{i} (0 - 0) +\hat{j} (0 - 0) + \hat{k} \bigg(\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2} -\frac{-2xy}{(x^2+y^2)^2}\bigg)= 0 $

My computation of curl of conservative vector field is zero. How is that?(Bigsmile)(Clapping)
A typo? Check the (3,2) component.
\begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix}

[math]\dfrac{ \partial }{ \partial x} \dfrac{x}{x^2 + y^2} - \dfrac{ \partial }{ \partial y} \dfrac{y}{x^2 + y^2} = \dfrac{((x^2 + y^2) - x(2x) ) - ((x^2 + y^2) - y(2y) }{ (x^2 + y^2)^2} = -2 \dfrac{x^2 - y^2}{(x^2 + y^2)^2}[/math]

-Dan
 
Last edited by a moderator:
topsquark said:
A typo? Check the (3,2) component.
\begin{vmatrix} i & j & k \\ \frac{\partial}{\partial{x}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{y}} & \frac{\partial}{\partial{z}} \\ \frac{y}{x^2+y^2} & \frac{x}{x^2+y^2} & 0 \end{vmatrix}

-Dan
Thanks. I corrected that now. You are correct. Curl of $\vec{f}$ is nonzero.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K