I've seen some articles using particle spin experiments to 'prove' that the results violate Bell's inequality and consequently local reality.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I've also seen stated that the same experiments can be done using other particle attributes such as polarisation. I can see how with polarisation, you can use Malus's law to 'prove' that the results are non-local, however, I can't seem to connect Bell's Inequality to experiments with polarised particles.

Can anyone help me with this?

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# B Proving entanglement using polarisation & Bell's Inequality

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads - Proving entanglement using | Date |
---|---|

I Proving The Church-Turing-Deutsch Principle | Nov 23, 2016 |

B How does the double slit experiment prove super position? | Jun 9, 2016 |

Proving Entanglement | Nov 11, 2015 |

Quantum Entanglement-what knowledge/logic was used to prove/predict QE therotically? | Jun 9, 2012 |

Proving Entanglement - Do we need Bells Theorem? | Apr 13, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**