MHB Proving Equivalence of f(x) and g(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pappoelarry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equivalence of the functions f(x)=(x-1)(x^4+x^3+x^2+x+1) and g(x)=x^5-1. Participants emphasize the need to multiply out f(x) to determine if the two functions are equivalent. There is a suggestion to post the multiplication steps for clarity, indicating some confusion among participants about polynomial multiplication. The conversation also includes a light-hearted critique of the original poster's algebra skills, suggesting they should take a basic algebra course. Ultimately, the focus remains on the mathematical proof of equivalence through polynomial expansion.
pappoelarry
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x-1)(x4+x³+x²+x+1) and g(x)=x5-1. If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Multiply out f(x). What do you get?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Multiply out f(x). What do you get?

-Dan
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
 
Can you multiply out polynomials? [math](x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1) = x(x^2 + x + 1) - (x^2 + x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + x - x^2 - x - 1 = x^3 - 1[/math] for example.

-Dan
 
pappoelarry said:
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
Step one: take an Algebra Course!

(Where did you get this problem?)
 
pappoelarry said:
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
First step- take an eighth or nineth grade (13 or 14 year old) algebra class!
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Back
Top