MHB Proving Equivalence of f(x) and g(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter pappoelarry
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
pappoelarry
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Consider the two functions f(x)=(x-1)(x4+x³+x²+x+1) and g(x)=x5-1. If they are equivalent, prove they are; if they are not equivalent, prove they aren't.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Multiply out f(x). What do you get?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Multiply out f(x). What do you get?

-Dan
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
 
Can you multiply out polynomials? [math](x - 1)(x^2 + x + 1) = x(x^2 + x + 1) - (x^2 + x + 1) = x^3 + x^2 + x - x^2 - x - 1 = x^3 - 1[/math] for example.

-Dan
 
pappoelarry said:
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
Step one: take an Algebra Course!

(Where did you get this problem?)
 
pappoelarry said:
huh
post the steps and ans. plss
First step- take an eighth or nineth grade (13 or 14 year old) algebra class!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top