Proving Every Integer > 11 is Sum of Two Composite Numbers

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that every integer greater than 11 can be expressed as the sum of two composite numbers using proof by contradiction. The user explores various cases, demonstrating that for both odd and even integers, it is possible to find a composite number such that the difference results in another composite number. The conclusion drawn is that for any integer greater than 11, two composite numbers can be identified whose sum equals that integer. However, the user expresses uncertainty about the necessity of the condition that m is greater than 11 in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of proof by contradiction
  • Familiarity with composite and prime numbers
  • Basic algebraic manipulation
  • Knowledge of integer properties
NEXT STEPS
  • Research advanced techniques in proof by contradiction
  • Study the properties of composite numbers in number theory
  • Explore the implications of Goldbach's conjecture
  • Learn about the distribution of prime numbers and their relation to composites
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and enthusiasts interested in number theory, particularly those exploring properties of integers and proofs involving composite numbers.

tanzl
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use proof by contradiction to show that every integer greater than 11 is a sum of two composite numbers.

The Attempt at a Solution


The question sounds a bit awkward for me since for the numbers I have tested so far. The number can be consists of 1 prime 1 composite or both primes or both composites. So, it is a headache to prove it by contradiction since every case can be true.

I have done something but I am not sure whether it can even considered to be a proof o not.
Assume that m is an integer larger than 11 and consists of 1 prime and 1 composite.
So, m = P + C
p = m - C
If m is an odd integer, 2k+1
I can always find an odd C (2l+1) such that p is a composite number.
p = 2k+1-2l-1
=2(k-l)
Note that I can choose C such that (k-l)>1
So, p is not a prime number.

Similiarly, if m is an even number (2k).
I can always find an even C (2l) such that p is a composite number.
p = 2k-2l
=2(k-l)
Note that I can choose C such that (k-l)>1
So, p is not a prime number.

Hence, contradiction for both cases. The conclusion is for integer>11. I can always find 2 composite number such that their sum is equals to the integer.

But the problem is I think I can also do the same thing such that when I find an appropriate C, p is a prime number. And also for the case both are primes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how you used the fact that m is greater than 11. It does not appear in your calculation.

I have not done a complete calculation, but I assume you could use the property:
'all prime numbers above q are of form q#·n + m, where 0 < m < q, and m has no prime factor ≤ q' (q# means the product of the primes up to q)
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
16
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K