Proving Existence of a Survivor in a Discrete Math Problem | Odd n Case

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of at least one survivor in a discrete math problem involving an odd number of people, each with a unique nearest neighbor. The proof utilizes mathematical induction, starting with the base case of three individuals. The author successfully demonstrates that at least one person survives by analyzing various distance scenarios. The challenge arises when extending the proof to a general case of 2k + 1 individuals, suggesting the need to consider subsets of 2k - 1 individuals to apply the inductive hypothesis.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with discrete mathematics concepts
  • Knowledge of distance metrics and comparisons
  • Ability to analyze subsets of a set
NEXT STEPS
  • Study mathematical induction techniques in depth
  • Explore discrete mathematics proofs involving nearest neighbors
  • Learn about subset analysis in combinatorial problems
  • Investigate similar problems in graph theory related to survivorship
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in mathematics, particularly those focused on discrete math and proof techniques, as well as anyone interested in combinatorial problem-solving strategies.

zohapmkoftid
Messages
27
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Suppose n > 1 people are positioned in a feld, so that each has a unique nearest neighbour. Suppose further that each person has a ball that is thrown at the nearest neighbour. A survivor is a person that is not hit by a ball. Prove that if n is odd, then there is at least one person surviving.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I try to prove by mathematical induction.
When n = 3
Let P1, P2, P3 be the 3 people and d12, d23, d13 be the distance between P1 and P2, P2 and P3, P1 and P3 respectively
Then I consider the different cases such as d12 < d23 and d13 > d12...etc
Under each situation, I can successfully prove that there is one person surviving.

After that, I assume the statement is true for n = 2k + 1
However, I have no idea of how to continue the proof
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If there are 2k+1 people, it might help to consider a subset of 2k-1 of them and use your inductive hypothesis
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
10K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
12K