Proving Existence of $\delta$ for Continuous Function $f$ s.t. $f(c)<5$

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter gimpy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuous Function
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence of a delta (\(\delta\)) for a continuous function \(f\) such that \(f(c) < 5\) implies \(f(x) < 7\) for all \(x\) in the interval \((c - \delta, c + \delta)\). The continuity of \(f\) at \(c\) ensures that \(\lim_{x \to c} f(x) = f(c) < 5\). By setting \(\epsilon = 2\), it is established that there exists a \(\delta > 0\) such that \(3 < f(x) < 7\), confirming the requirement. The proof hinges on the definition of continuity and the properties of limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of continuity in functions
  • Knowledge of limits and the epsilon-delta definition
  • Familiarity with inequalities and their manipulation
  • Basic concepts of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Explore continuity and its implications in real analysis
  • Learn about the properties of continuous functions and their limits
  • Investigate examples of proving inequalities involving limits
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching calculus concepts, and anyone interested in the formal proofs of continuity and limits.

gimpy
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
Im having a little trouble with this question.

If f is continuous at c and f(c) &lt; 5, prove that there exists a \delta &gt; 0 such that f(x) &lt; 7 for all x \in (c - \delta , c + \delta)

So we are given that f is continuous at c.
So \lim_{x \to c}f(x) = f(c) &lt; 5
\forall \epsilon &gt; 0 \exists \delta &gt; 0 such that whenever |x - c| &lt; \delta then |f(x) - f(c)| &lt; \epsilon

|x - c| &lt; \delta
-\delta &lt; x - c &lt; \delta
c - \delta &lt; x &lt; c + \delta

Ok now I am getting lost..
I know i have to do something with |f(x) - f(c)| &lt; \epsilon
maybe
|f(x) - 5| &lt; \epsilon
-\epsilon &lt; f(x) - 5 &lt; \epsilon
5 - \epsilon &lt; f(x) &lt; 5 + \epsilon
we want f(x) &lt; 7 so ... am i on the right track? How can i find the \delta &gt; 0 that satisfies this?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gimpy said:
5 - \epsilon &lt; f(x) &lt; 5 + \epsilon
we want f(x) &lt; 7 so ... am i on the right track? How can i find the \delta &gt; 0 that satisfies this?

Yes, you're on the right track. Take \epsilon=2. From the limit you mentioned, we know that there exists a \delta&gt;0 such that 3&lt;f(x)&lt;7 and so you are done. The question was asking you to show that a delta exists, and the limit demonstrates that it clearly does, so you are done.
 
I was actually thinking about making \epsilon = 2 but thought it was to easy. Ok so thanks for explaining the question a bit more to me, i understand it now. :smile:
 
gimpy,

Isn't what you're asked to prove equivalent to,

\lim_{x \to c}f(x) = f(c) &lt; 7

which follows trivially from,

\lim_{x \to c}f(x) = f(c) &lt; 5

which was what you were given?
 
No, that's not what was given. Given that the limit is less than 5 it is true, but requires proof, that, for x close to c, f(x)< 5. gimpy was asked to prove the slightly simpler case: that, for x close to c, f(x)< 7.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K