Proving Existence of lim (x--->c) {f(x)} = l

  • Thread starter Thread starter maximus101
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the existence of the limit lim (x-->c) {f(x)} = l using the epsilon-delta definition of limits. It establishes that if both one-sided limits, lim (x-->c+) {f(x)} and lim (x-->c-) {f(x)}, exist and are equal to a common value l, then the two-sided limit also exists and equals l. The participants emphasize the importance of constructing a rigorous epsilon-delta proof to validate this conclusion, highlighting its straightforward nature when approached correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Epsilon-delta definition of limits
  • Understanding of one-sided limits
  • Basic knowledge of real analysis
  • Familiarity with functions and their continuity
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-delta definition of limits in detail
  • Practice proving limits using epsilon-delta arguments
  • Explore examples of functions with one-sided limits
  • Learn about continuity and its relationship to limits
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying real analysis, educators teaching calculus concepts, and anyone interested in understanding the formal proofs of limits.

maximus101
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
suppose that f : (a,b)\{c} ----> real numbers is a function such that

lim (x--->c+) {f(x)} and lim (x--->c-) {f(x)} both exist and are equal to a common value l.

how can we actually prove that lim (x--->c) {f(x)} exists and that it equals l?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try a [tex]\epsilon,\delta[/tex] proof. It's not to hard if you do just that...
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K