MHB Proving F=-constant*(delta y) for delta y < d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mango12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
AI Thread Summary
To prove that F = -constant * (delta y) for delta y < d, the discussion focuses on analyzing the forces acting on a system of charged balls, including weight, tension, and electric force. The participants emphasize the need to apply Newton's second law and consider the relationship between the forces in both x and y directions. Key equations involve the electric force between point charges and the tension in the system, which can be expressed in terms of the angle theta and the displacement delta y. The goal is to demonstrate that the negative charge behaves like a spring, oscillating up and down, which requires substituting the correct values into the derived equations. Understanding these relationships is crucial for completing the proof.
Mango12
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
View attachment 5404

I need to prove that F=-constant*(delta y) if delta y < d

I have no idea how to go about this. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 99
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mango12 said:
I need to prove that F=-constant*(delta y) if delta y < d

I have no idea how to go about this. Please help!
Look at one of the white balls. There are three forces acting on it: 1) the weight, 2) the tension, and last but not least, 3) the electric force. If the system is stable then the sum of these forces is 0 N.

Can you finish from there or do you need more detail?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Look at one of the white balls. There are three forces acting on it: 1) the weight, 2) the tension, and last but not least, 3) the electric force. If the system is stable then the sum of these forces is 0 N.

Can you finish from there or do you need more detail?

-Dan

well I think weight is mgsin(theta) and tension is Fesin(theta) + mgcos(theta)

But I don't know theta and I don't get what delta y has to do with it
 
Mango12 said:
well I think weight is mgsin(theta) and tension is Fesin(theta) + mgcos(theta)

But I don't know theta and I don't get what delta y has to do with it
I didn't notice this last night...What force are you trying to find?

Either way you are likely to have to consider at least some of the following...

Consider the charge on the right. The electric force between two point charges is [math]F = \frac{k q^2}{d^2}[/math]. The weight of the ball is mg, and you have a tension force,T, acting up and to the left at an angle [math]\theta[/math]. Using the usual xy coordinate system we have Newton's 2nd:
[math]\sum F_x = -T~cos( \theta ) + \frac{kq^2}{d^2} = 0 [/math]

[math]\sum F_y = T~sin( \theta ) - mg = 0[/math]

Use the y equation to get an equation for T. Put that T value into the x equation. That will get you an equation for d in terms of [math]\theta[/math]. Beyond that I don't know what force you are trying to calculate.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I didn't notice this last night...What force are you trying to find?

Either way you are likely to have to consider at least some of the following...

Consider the charge on the right. The electric force between two point charges is [math]F = \frac{k q^2}{d^2}[/math]. The weight of the ball is mg, and you have a tension force,T, acting up and to the left at an angle [math]\theta[/math]. Using the usual xy coordinate system we have Newton's 2nd:
[math]\sum F_x = -T~cos( \theta ) + \frac{kq^2}{d^2} = 0 [/math]

[math]\sum F_y = T~sin( \theta ) - mg = 0[/math]

Use the y equation to get an equation for T. Put that T value into the x equation. That will get you an equation for d in terms of [math]\theta[/math]. Beyond that I don't know what force you are trying to calculate.

-Dan

I'm not sure. I do know I need to show that the negative charge would bounce up and down as if on a spring.
 
Mango12 said:
I'm not sure. I do know I need to show that the negative charge would bounce up and down as if on a spring.
Show that F = -constant * delta y

This is what I have so far that we did in class. He said we needed to make a substitution somewhere but I don’t understand where

2F=[Kq^2/r^2]2

Fy = [2Kq^2/r^2] sin theta

Sin theta = delta y/r
Sin theta = delta y/(d/2)
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top