Proving Fourier Bessel Series Expansion with Limiting Procedures

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the Fourier Bessel series expansion represented by the equation \(\frac{1}{\left(\rho^2+z^2\right)^{1/2}}=\int^{\infty}_{0} e^{-k\left|z\right|}J_{0}(k\rho)dk\). Participants emphasize the importance of using the integral representation of the zero-order Bessel function \(J_{0}(k\rho)\) and suggest switching the order of integration to facilitate the proof. The connection between the Hankel transform and the 2D Fourier transform of cylindrical symmetric functions is also highlighted as a crucial step in the solution.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Fourier Bessel series and their applications
  • Familiarity with Bessel functions, specifically the zero-order Bessel function \(J_{0}(k\rho)\)
  • Knowledge of integral transforms, particularly the Hankel transform
  • Basic principles of 2D Fourier transforms and cylindrical symmetry
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties and applications of Bessel functions in mathematical physics
  • Learn about the Hankel transform and its relation to Fourier transforms
  • Explore the derivation and applications of the 2D Fourier transform
  • Investigate limiting procedures in mathematical proofs and their significance
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineering students focusing on applied mathematics, particularly those working with Fourier analysis and Bessel functions in cylindrical coordinates.

cabin5
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


By appropriate limiting procedures prove the following expansion
\frac{1}{\left(\rho^2+z^2\right)^{1/2}}=\int^{\infty}_{0} e^{-k\left|z\right|}J_{0}(k\rho)dk


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



I tried to implicate the fourier-bessel series but it turned out that there is no k dependence on coefficients of the series.

What can I do to proceed this question?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you should write out the integral representation of this 0-order bessel function, and then switch the integrals. With this you get a 2D Fourier transform of the given function.
After all, the Hankel-transform with zero order bessel functions, is the 2D Fourier transform of some cylindricaly symmetric two variable function.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K