Proving Hopf Invariant and Degree of g for f⋅g

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter eok20
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Degree Invariant
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship between the Hopf invariant and the degree of a continuous mapping in algebraic topology. Specifically, it states that for mappings f: S^3 → S^2 and g: S^3 → S^3, the equation H(f ∘ g) = deg g H(f) holds true, where H represents the Hopf invariant and deg g denotes the degree of g. The participants reference the definitions of the Hopf invariant from Bott-Tu and the characterization of degree from differential topology, emphasizing the need for a solid understanding of algebraic topology concepts to grasp the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hopf invariant as defined in Bott-Tu
  • Familiarity with the concept of degree in differential topology
  • Knowledge of cohomology groups, specifically 2-dimensional and 4-dimensional
  • Basic principles of algebraic topology, particularly regarding mappings between spheres
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Hopf invariant as detailed in Bott-Tu, pages 227-228
  • Research the characterization of degree in differential topology via the provided Wikipedia link
  • Explore algebraic topology definitions and proofs related to mappings between spheres
  • Investigate the relationship between cohomology and homology in algebraic topology
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, particularly those specializing in algebraic topology, as well as students seeking to understand the relationship between Hopf invariants and degrees of continuous mappings.

eok20
Messages
198
Reaction score
0
Can someone give me some hints on how to prove the following statement: if f: S^3 \to S^2, g: S^3 \to S^3 then H(f\circ g) = deg~g H(f) where H is the Hopf invariant and deg g is the degree of g. I'm pretty clueless on how to start and I don't see how to get the deg to come in since that has to do with 3-d cohomology but the Hopf invariant has to do with 2-d and 4-d cohomology.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
quasar987 said:
I don't know what definitions you are using, but with the definition of the Hopf invariant given at page 227-228 of Bott-Tu and then using the caracterisation of degree found at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Degree_of_a_continuous_mapping#Differential_topology, it is very simple.

Thanks-- I should have clarified. I'm interested in the algebraic topological definition and proof. Here, the Hopf invariant is the integer h such that \alpha \smile \alpha = h\beta where \alpha generates the 2-d cohomology and \beta generates the 4-d cohomology of the mapping cone of f:S^3 \to S^2. The degree of g:S^3\to S^3 is the integer d such that f_* \gamma = d\gamma where \gamma generates the 3-d homology of S^3.

Unfortunately, I have very little intuition/feel for algebraic topology and I much prefer the differential forms and differential topology analogs.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
918