Proving: If A is \lambda ^* -measurable, Then x+A is \lambda ^* -measurable

  • Thread starter Thread starter CornMuffin
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Lambda Measurable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if a set A is λ*-measurable, then the translated set x + A is also λ*-measurable. The proof utilizes the properties of the Lebesgue outer measure (λ*), specifically its translation invariance. The key argument involves demonstrating that for any subset T of the entire space, the equation λ*(T ∩ (x + A)) + λ*(T ∩ (x + A)^c) = λ*(T) holds true. The initial proof attempt was noted to have the correct ideas but lacked the proper setup to reach the conclusion definitively.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of λ*-measurable sets
  • Familiarity with Lebesgue outer measure (λ*)
  • Knowledge of Carathéodory's Criterion for measurability
  • Basic concepts of set theory and translation in Euclidean spaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Lebesgue outer measure, focusing on translation invariance
  • Review Carathéodory's Criterion for establishing measurability
  • Explore examples of λ*-measurable sets and their translations
  • Practice proving measurability for various sets in ℝ^n
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students studying measure theory, and anyone interested in the properties of measurable sets and Lebesgue measure.

CornMuffin
Messages
51
Reaction score
5

Homework Statement


Prove:
If [itex]A[/itex] is [itex]\lambda ^*[/itex]-measurable and [itex]x\in \mathbb{R} ^n[/itex]
then [itex]x+A[/itex] is [itex]\lambda ^*[/itex]-measurable.

My attempt at the proof is below, but i feel like it is not a correct proof.

Homework Equations


Notation:
[itex]\lambda ^*[/itex] is the lebesgue outer measure


The Attempt at a Solution


Proof:
let [itex]A[/itex] be a [itex]\lambda ^*[/itex]-measurable set, and let [itex]x\in \mathbb{R} ^n[/itex] and let [itex]S[/itex] be the entire space.
Then [itex]\forall T\subset S[/itex], [itex]\lambda ^* (T) = \lambda ^* (T\cap A)+\lambda ^* (T\cap A^c )[/itex]
Lesbesgue outer measure is translation invariant,
so, [itex]\lambda ^* (T-x) = \lambda ^* ((T-x)\cap A) + \lambda ^* ((T-x)\cap A^c)[/itex]
[itex] =\lambda ^* (T\cap (A+x)) + \lambda ^* (T\cap (A^c +x)) [/itex]
[itex] = \lambda ^* (T\cap (A+x)) + \lambda ^* (T\cap (A+x)^c)[/itex]
[itex] = \lambda ^* (T)[/itex]

so, [itex]x+A[/itex] is [itex]\lambda ^*[/itex]-measurable
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Using Caratheodory's Criterion is the correct way of doing this, but all you've concluded is what you knew to begin with: the outer measure is translation invariant.

You know that A is measurable right? And to show that x+A is measurable you must show that
[itex]\lambda^*(T \cap (x+A)) + \lambda^*(T \cap (x+A)^c ) = \lambda^*(T)[/itex]
for every set [itex]T \subseteq \mathbb R^n[/itex]. So try starting with [itex]\lambda^*(T \cap (x+A)) + \lambda^*(T \cap (x+A)^c )[/itex] and see if you can get the [itex]\lambda^*(T)[/itex]

Edit: Your proof has the right ideas, but not the right set-up.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
6K