Proving "If f is Simultaneously an Eigenfunction of L^2 & L_z

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Funzies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Spin
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that if a function f is simultaneously an eigenfunction of L^2 and L_z, the square of the eigenvalue of L_z cannot exceed the eigenvalue of L^2. The hint provided suggests evaluating the expression , which represents the expectation value of L^2 in Dirac notation. Additionally, the discussion touches on the calculation of using the spin operator S_x, emphasizing the differences between Dirac notation and coordinate representation.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum mechanics concepts such as eigenfunctions and operators.
  • Familiarity with Dirac notation and its application in quantum mechanics.
  • Knowledge of angular momentum operators, specifically L^2 and L_z.
  • Basic proficiency in calculating expectation values in quantum mechanics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of angular momentum operators in quantum mechanics.
  • Learn about the mathematical framework of Dirac notation and its applications.
  • Explore the relationship between eigenvalues of operators and their physical interpretations.
  • Investigate the role of spin operators in quantum mechanics and their implications.
USEFUL FOR

Quantum mechanics students, physicists, and researchers interested in angular momentum theory and the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics.

Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
I've got two short questions I was hoping you could help me with:

-I have to prove:
"if f is simulateneously an eigenfunction of L^2 and L_z, the square of the eigenvalue of L_z cannot exceed the eigenvalue of L^2"
He gives a hint that I should evaluate
<f|L^2|f>
But I don't have a clue what he means by this notation?!

-Why does this hold:
<S_x> = \chi^+S_x\chi
I am familiar with calculating <x> by doing:
&lt;x&gt;=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi(x)^*x\psi(x)dx
But I do not understand this different situation. Could you tell me the underlying differences/similarities?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "S_x" is one of the spin-operators. He has a trivial action in the Hilbert space of angular momentul states. So just forget about the spin, remember what you have to prove.

Another hint would be to connect the square of L_z and the L^2.
 
&lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is dirac notation and is more or less the same as \int_{-\inf}^{\inf}f(x)^*L^2f(x)dx so its essentially the expectation value &lt;L^2&gt; in this case. The difference is, dirac notation does not imply a particular representation for your state function f. When you write f(x), it is referred to as the coordinate representation, ie your state function is a function of position. You could also write your state function as a function of momentum, or whatever else.

In short, the &lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is a more general way to represent the integral you are used to.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K