Proving Incommensurability in Number Theory with a Graph

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter e2m2a
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the incommensurability of two line segments defined by the function f(x) = x². Participants clarify that the area under the curve y = x² does not have an upper bound, making it impossible to define a maximum point c on the x-axis. The conversation emphasizes the need for precise definitions of points a, b, and c, as well as the areas they enclose. Ultimately, the participants conclude that the problem as stated lacks clarity and requires a more rigorous mathematical framework to address incommensurability.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of calculus, specifically area under curves
  • Familiarity with the concept of incommensurability in number theory
  • Knowledge of graphing quadratic functions, particularly y = x²
  • Basic principles of limits and unbounded functions
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of the function f(x) = x² and its graph
  • Research the concept of incommensurability in mathematics
  • Learn about the definite integral and its application to finding areas under curves
  • Explore the implications of unbounded functions in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of calculus, and anyone interested in the concepts of area under curves and incommensurability in number theory.

e2m2a
Messages
354
Reaction score
13
Does anyone know a theorem in number theory or mathematics that could be used to prove the following problem: Given a function f(x) = x sq. Graph the function and with two vertical lines, divide the area under the graph such that the two areas are equal. Denote the point on the x-axis where the first vertical line intersects as point a. Denote the point on the x-axis where the second vertical line intersects as point b. Denote point c on the x-axis as the maximum number in the domain of the function. Thus, the area above the line segment from 0 to a is equal to the area above the line segment from b to c. Prove that the line segment from 0 to a is always incommensurable with the line segment from b to c.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
e2m2a said:
Does anyone know a theorem in number theory or mathematics that could be used to prove the following problem: Given a function f(x) = x sq.
What do you mean by 'x sq." ? x^2?

Graph the function and with two vertical lines, divide the area under the graph such that the two areas are equal.
What "area under the graph". If you meant y= x^2, that graph does not a have an upper bound. Do you you mean the area of the regions having y= x^2 as upper edge, for x> 0 and x< 0? I am going to assume you mean to find two numbers, a and b, such that the area of the region bounded by y= x^2, y= 0, and x= a is the same as the area of the region bounded by y= x^2, y= 0, x= a, and x= b.

Denote the point on the x-axis where the first vertical line intersects as point a. Denote the point on the x-axis where the second vertical line intersects as point b. Denote point c on the x-axis as the maximum number in the domain of the function.
There is no such maximum for y= x^2. And is c a point or a number?

Thus, the area above the line segment from 0 to a is equal to the area above the line segment from b to c.
??Didn't you just say that that was true for y= 0?

Prove that the line segment from 0 to a is always incommensurable with the line segment from b to c.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K