Proving Inequality: Non-Negative Variables and Limitations Explained

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Demonoid
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality (x-2y+z)² ≥ 4xz - 8y, where x, y, and z are non-negative variables constrained by x + z ≤ 2. Participants explore various approaches to manipulate and simplify the inequality, while also addressing potential mistakes in their reasoning.

Discussion Character

  • Mathematical reasoning
  • Debate/contested
  • Homework-related

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests starting with y = 0 to simplify the inequality to (x-z)² ≥ 0, but expresses confusion about how y could ever be zero.
  • Another participant points out a mistake in the expansion of (a-b)², indicating that the initial approach may be flawed.
  • A later reply proposes a new expression (x-z)² - 4(yx - yz + y² + 2y) ≥ 0, indicating progress but still questioning the role of y being zero.
  • Further manipulation leads to the expression (x-z)² - 4yx - 4yz + 4y² + 8y ≥ 0, with participants discussing potential errors in the formulation.
  • One participant attempts to expand and rearrange the original inequality, suggesting that the non-negativity of y could lead to a valid conclusion.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the best approach to prove the inequality. There are multiple competing views on how to manipulate the expressions and the implications of setting y to zero.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved mathematical steps and potential errors in the manipulation of expressions. The discussion reflects various assumptions about the values of x, y, and z, particularly in relation to the constraint x + z ≤ 2.

Demonoid
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
Question:
I need to prove this inequality:
Where x,y,x are non-negative and x+z<=2:

(x-2y+z)^2 >= 4xz -8y.

My attempt:

I thought maybe choosing x as 0 and z as 0 will and then solving for y... but that only yields y+2 >= 0, which isn't really a solution, since I can't choose numbers.

all suggestions are appreciated

thanks !
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Consider that if y = 0, that formula becomes (x-z)^2 >= 0. That should give you a clue.
 
vertigo said:
Consider that if y = 0, that formula becomes (x-z)^2 >= 0. That should give you a clue.

I don't get this clue :-p How's y ever going to be 0 ?
Even if y is 0, it will be (x+z)^2 >= 4xz, which isn't very helpful...

I need to prove this:
(x-2y+z)^2 >= 4xz -8y.

using this:
x+z<=2:I can't seem to simplify (x-2y+z)^2 >= 4xz -8y enough to get x,y,z by themselves..
I expanded first:
x^2 - 4y^2 + z^2 >= 4xz - 8y.
and then got this:

(x-z)^2 - 4y^2 + 8y^2 >= 2xz and I'm stuck...

I don't know how I can use x+z<=2 ?
 
Last edited:
Demonoid said:
I can't seem to simplify (x-2y+z)^2 >= 4xz -8y enough to get x,y,z by themselves..
I expanded first:
x^2 - 4y^2 + z^2 >= 4xz - 8y.

That is wrong. (a-b)^2 does not equal a^2 - b^2.
 
Keep trying, you've made mistakes.
 
Ok, I think I'm getting closer:

Here's what I've got:

(x-z)^2 - 4(yx - yz + y^2 + 2y) >=0

now I get why y = 0, would give me (x-z)^2...

but how would y be equal to 0 ?
 
Now you need to look at that, manipulate it, and convince yourself that it is true.

Oh, I think you have a slight error with that formula.
 
Last edited:
(x-z)^2 - 4yx - 4yz +4y^2 + 8y >= 0

is this right ?
 
Let's look at it from the start, from the following expression:
(x-2y+z)^{2}-4xz+8y
Exapanding the parenthesis, and rearranging, we get:
(x-2y+z)^{2}-4xz+8y=x^{2}-2xz+z^{2}+4(y^{2}+(2-(x+z))y=(x-z)^{2}+4(y^{2}+Ay), A=2-(x+z)&gt;0

Now, since y is non-negative, your result follows easily..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K