Proving Inequality using Arithmetic and Order Axioms

  • Thread starter Thread starter synkk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving an inequality using the axioms of arithmetic and order. The specific problem states that for all x, y satisfying 0 ≤ x, 0 ≤ y, and x ≤ y, it must be shown that x.x ≤ y.y. Participants express confusion about how to begin the proof and explore the implications of the axioms provided.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to apply the axioms of arithmetic and order to establish the inequality but express uncertainty about the next steps after initial applications. Questions arise regarding the specific axioms being used and how they relate to the proof. Some participants also consider proving the converse of the original statement.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants sharing their attempts and seeking clarification on the axioms. Some guidance has been offered regarding the application of axioms to derive further implications, but no consensus has been reached on a complete proof.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the need for clarity on the specific axioms being referenced, as variations exist. There is also mention of proving the converse statement, which introduces additional complexity to the discussion.

synkk
Messages
216
Reaction score
0
Using only the axioms of arithmetic and order, show that:

for all x,y satisfy 0≤x, 0≤y and x≤y, then x.x ≤ y.y

I'm really lost on where to start, my attempt so far was this

as 0 <= x and 0 <= y, we have 0 <= xy from axiom (for all x,y,z x<=y and 0<=z, then x.z <=y.z). then we use the same axiom to get y.y >= 0, but not sure where to go from there
 
Physics news on Phys.org
synkk said:
Using only the axioms of arithmetic and order, show that:

for all x,y satisfy 0≤x, 0≤y and x≤y, then x.x ≤ y.y

I'm really lost on where to start, my attempt so far was this

as 0 <= x and 0 <= y, we have 0 <= xy from axiom (for all x,y,z x<=y and 0<=z, then x.z <=y.z). then we use the same axiom to get y.y >= 0, but not sure where to go from there

There are several versions of the "axioms", so you need to tell us exactly what axioms you are given.
 
synkk said:
Using only the axioms of arithmetic and order, show that:

for all x,y satisfy 0≤x, 0≤y and x≤y, then x.x ≤ y.y

I'm really lost on where to start, my attempt so far was this

as 0 <= x and 0 <= y, we have 0 <= xy from axiom (for all x,y,z x<=y and 0<=z, then x.z <=y.z). then we use the same axiom to get y.y >= 0, but not sure where to go from there

Do you see how your axiom, when applied to the hypothesis that 0≤x, 0≤y and x≤y, gives you both x.x≤y.x and x.y≤y.y?

Do you see where to go from here?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks I got it from there.

How would I go about proving it the other way? I.e. if 0 <= x, 0 <= y, x.x <= y.y then x <= y? How would I prove that? I have gotten to (x-y).(x-y) <= 0 but not sure how to actually prove it using the axioms which are:

A1 (x+y)+z = x+(y+z)
A2 x + y = y + x
A3 x + 0 = x for all x
A3 x + (-x) = 0
A5 x.(y.z) = (x.y).z
A6 x.y = y.x
A7 x.1 = x
A8 x.x^(-1) = 1
A9 x.(y+z) = (x.y) +(x.z)

A10 x<=y or y<=x for all x,y
A11 if x<=y and y <=x then x = y
A12 x<=y and y <=z then x<=z
A13 x<=y then x + z <= y + z
A14 x<=y and 0<=z then x.z <=y.z
 
synkk said:
Thanks I got it from there.

How would I go about proving it the other way? I.e. if 0 <= x, 0 <= y, x.x <= y.y then x <= y? How would I prove that?

I think the easiest way to prove this is by contradiction.

I have gotten to (x-y).(x-y) <= 0 but not sure how to actually prove it using the axioms which are:

...

If you want to try this, I think it'd be easier to start with ##0\leq y^2-x^2=(y+x)(y-x)##.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K